So, according to the tree-huggers, so long as Nike is green-friendly, it's acceptable that they exploit child labor.

...right.

So Apple is not eco-friendly, what a shocker. The only people that might have thought so are the ones that think their hybrid doesn't run on gas, it runs on magic and is totally "green".

And Nike got that good score only because they run sweatshops, can't get much greener than that.

This is all so hypocritical and complete BS. 

Please tell me - what the the "carbon footprint" of this site to "inform" me that Apple isn't "green" enough for some group of loopy, tree-huggers? What much energy was used to produce and host this site? How much energy was used by the company to produce the report? How much energy was used for ALLLLL of those/these people to read it? OH, right, everyone turn off your computer now and stick your head in the sand. 

Please, pretty please - go make a hemp skirt, run into the mountains, live in a cave, eat grass and twigs, and leave the rest of us alone.