The Inquirer-Home
Comments
2 SATA II for LESS Ultie Troubles?

Crossfire X, which ?if there are 3 seperate assembly areas & one firing line out, could be real power to very complex. i.e. large gb sixe game or fast workstation powerful,By Each Card Doing 1/3 of pixels, really lot of detailing may be result.? yet probably XP or server 2008 thing. I think 2 SATA II ports visible are to reduce total file thru put & make ULTIMATE on this board more like what has worked, Fast, Furious & low density of final output, due to lack of all but RAID ?0?. or no RAID at all by some complex mess default?meaning its on & unwanted goes fast, yet actual mechanism is still close to non-udma pata in resultant final thruput?.

Anyway its cut back storage system from UT DR G.

So up with pci e & if lucky few other scores, yet doubtful, in all ways compromise of old & new Crossfire X.
YEAH FOR CROSSFIRE X.

Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.



.


posted by : ULTIE_TOM, 25 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Three slots?

Three PCI-E slots? That isn't enough for Quad Crossfire, is it? Is Crossfire X not four cards?

posted by : AC, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
CrossfireX

CrossfireX is designed to allow more then two cards in Crossfire. That means that it will work with 3 and 4 card Crossfire configurations.

posted by : 510, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
CrossfireX

So, in order to get full quad Crossfire support, they're gonna have to cut out some PCI/PCI-E 1x slot(s) or use extended ATX form factor, huh? I hope they got with extended ATX. No one who builds a quad Crossfire rig does so in a small case.

posted by : Polynikes, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment

DFI outed with 790FX board

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?