The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Is that irony, or is it ?

Let me see if I got that right : Microsoft, for reasons unknown to the layman, decided to tie DirectX 10 to the CPU to "bypass the hardware with an additional abstraction layer", thus obfuscating everything and making Creative drive users nuts for upwards of 18 months after Vista was set upon the world with buggy sound drivers for its X-Fi.
Now Intel comes and says "Hey guys, all this actually does is increase the power drain, so let's hijack this and cut off all the surplus polling to the CPU which cannot go into low-power mode any more.", thus eliminating Microsoft's efforts at "abstraction", reducing power requirements and, in the end, making Microsoft backpedal on its DX10 specs to accommodate the new architecture.
All that because of some hippies groaning about global warming.
Ain't it nice to see that Microsoft can actually have its plans stalled every decade or so ?

posted by : Pascal Monett, 03 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Realtek Vienna?

Huh. This means nothing to me.

posted by : Scintilla, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Powerdrains.

Yes, and then give us a eco friendly operating system to go with this new hardware. Let us all make a difference.

posted by : Jimbo, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
One Amiga?

Even 3 Amigas didn't need that much juice! I distinctly remember my A500 plus came with a 40 watt power brick, 40x3=120. Still 10 watts under the 130 watt TDP you mentioned.

posted by : Gordon, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
It's about time the CPU had Audio section built in,

plus other sections built in like the memory controller, hard disk controller, etc, basically all the other chips on the motherboard should all be on the cpu.

posted by : interested_party, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
20 years too late

Everthing still works ok on my Amiga at an amazing 7.2Mhz and 1MB of RAM. What can I say?

its a shame commodore made a *$$% of things in the eary 90's otherwise things would have been very different.




posted by : RIchard, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Get 2ch right!

All that is fine for laptop/gamer/receiver/ipod quality audio, but there is still a need for affordable, audiophile-level Stereo cards to maximize 192/24 downloads. We don't need dsp enhancement - just get the raw data right, thanks! Cards still have too many capacitors in the analog signal path, not enough on the power rails, and excessive jitter - just like this year's receiver and last year's. Same poor implementation not improved by more Dolby or dbx codec logos. Do 2ch well instead of crap 7.1 with space and budget.

These audio DSPs need to support firmware updates for bug fixes and new codecs. Bugs limiting NIC IP offload and ICH9/10R SSD slowness might have been fixable with firmware.

posted by : Mark K, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
512KB or 512MB ?

is it half a giga or half a mega ?

posted by : Seghir, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Re: W.-

Palladium anyone? :-D

posted by : Tim D, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Misplaced bit

On behalf of charlie I'd like to point out you completely forgot the mention of the processing required by the DRM on top of it all.

posted by : W.-, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment

Generic PC audio turns intelligent

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?