The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Well,

who has their IP? Let's publish it here. Just because the DNS record is gone doesn't mean the site's not reachable.

posted by : STAT, 21 April 2009 Complain about this comment
havnea a clue

Aye tell me aboot it.

Noo if they shut doon a' webshites wi' tha intent tae shilence tha mashess naen o' us wud ken wat tae dae aboot it, likes ken!

awa' noo an' ponder tha' wan.

posted by : loose moose, 20 February 2008 Complain about this comment
Tee hee

Hee hee. Thanks Karlsbad, you made me giggle.

Anyways, this whole thing is pretty silly. Everyone is silly. Silly!

posted by : Karlsbad Fan, 19 February 2008 Complain about this comment
Poor wee Wiki Leaks.

Kirsch! Daft Shame he dinnae ken tae ne'er whistle-blow a Swiss Banker on a jelly roll witth his Inch-Caymens Branch!

Counter-intuitive tae Geneva Carnventions; Moost be shaer torture tae be denied hame domainly; shaer hekill sculdudry!

Likely 'is thrae weird sister sites wi' taken more skelps sense noo ben forcibly raped like a Git'mo tattie. Fraee Spaich is wabbit 'ere!

posted by : Karlsbad, 19 February 2008 Complain about this comment
corrections

It actually wasn't "switched off," "taken off-line," or "closed down." Dynadot is their Domain Name Service or DNS provider, not their Internet Service Provider or ISP, and so although the name "wikileaks.org" no longer points to their server, the server is still up and running, and you can get to it through a few other names, as detailed on the wikipedia page describing wikileaks.

posted by : Will Warner, 19 February 2008 Complain about this comment

Wikileaks.org switched off

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?