I suppose it would be too much to ask an Inq writer - particularly this one - to do enough research to know it's Godwin that gets invoked, not "Godfrey", whoever that is?

Perhaps he should have http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law looked it up.

Wikipedia is run by a bunch of pretentious winkers.

The part where the article makes fun of WP is just a everyday thing here, and it's always lovely to read. The rest doesn't really matter.

Save EG!

mycelo

...the 3 posters before me don't get the point of the article. The author isn't making fun of Wikipedia all that much...he's really making fun of the woman who is freaking out that an encyclopedia would contain Nazi information and symbolizm.

Here we go again. This is getting really old.

It's an ENCYCLOPEDIA! Of course it will have such images.

not funny, nick. try again.

I know you don't like wackypedia. But there's nothing promoting nazis in that article. People should read more and look at pictures less. The whole let's-ban-all-symbols-thing is ridiculous. Swastika is normal geometrical thingy. Nobody's banning hammer and sickle.

Again the inq has to go pathetic in an article on wikipedia, great job.