The Inquirer-Home
Comments
fo from DDR3 to DDR5

I think that DDR4 should be skipped altogether.

Focus DDR4 resources on speeding up DDR5 development. Graphics DDR4 had a short life, and didn't provide significant improvement over DDR3. Same is bound to happen in computer RAM world. Don't make the same mistake, skip a generation, and move from DDR3 to DDR5.


posted by : dave, 22 August 2008 Complain about this comment
If we altogether

sacrifice the ram, will we still come to the end of timings?

posted by : Justin, 22 August 2008 Complain about this comment
Turtle ram

I prefer to see ram with less latency rather than more brute speed. Aside from the synthetic benchmarksDDR 400 doesn't feel "slow".

posted by : Ryoma-Echizen, 20 August 2008 Complain about this comment
DAMN ...

I was hoping no one would mention that "end of the world" thingy ... I had such high hopes for a totally kick-ass Nehalem rig by that time ...

posted by : AKHandyman, 20 August 2008 Complain about this comment
End of World

Yeah, so I look for DDR4 to have a *very* short life, and DDR5 to not make it to the starting block at all.

Isn't it wonderful knowing that soon all will come to an end?

posted by : Rich Wargo, 19 August 2008 Complain about this comment
2012

some say it's not the end of the world but a change of collective consciousness through out the world. Which is going to considered the end the "world" as we know it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YomEEicpxcc

looks likes that's going to be happening with ddr3/4 :-D

posted by : Charles Thorsen, 19 August 2008 Complain about this comment

Qimonda DDR3 moving forward

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?