The Inquirer-Home
Comments
drink the kool-aid

Rah-rah Linux.

Microsoft sucks. Obviously they are playing catch-up to VMware. Pick your favorite of the following statements:

"I hate Microsoft because they only allow their OS and products to work with other Microsoft products"

"I hate MIcrosoft because they release add-ons to work with other products"

You get both at The Inquirer, depending on the week!

posted by : Phil, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Linux on Windows is very useful

I run a comercial service where I supply VMware RHEL servers as guests on Windows 2003. This is for the simple reason that RHEL does firewalls and mail filters much better than Windows.

I use a second LAN port that is 'owned' by the RHEL guest and do all firewall and mail stuff through that and then forward it to the windows host via a shared LAN port.

Problems? Yes a few. First the damned windows operators perpetually reboot the system for patches and upgrades - keeping my uptime down to windows standards.

Second, timekeeping is a big problem using VMware and I have yet to see a completely satisfactory solution. If MS have a good fix I may move from VMware to their offering.

posted by : Jeremy, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Linux under Windows

I personally run Linux under VMWare all the time. For developing PHP / MySQL applications under Windows I find it an effective way to cut electricity costs by running my testing server as a Virtual Machine. And if something goes amiss I can simply swap it out with a recent, or template image without affecting my production server. Cheers.

posted by : Daryl Quenet, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Server Only - not VM PC 2007

No use to anyone - VM Server only what about VM PC for all those users at home..?

posted by : Sean, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Desperate or just same old same old?

I don’t think this is Microsoft getting desperate. I think this is Microsoft defending its monopoly from future lawsuits. The defence goes something like this: We support full interoperability with competing products like Linux. As long as the competitors run it on top of windows. It is technically impossible for us to interoperate any other way without disclosing our patents, IP etc. So if you want to run linux and communicate with windows you can as long as you run windows. See win win for Microsoft.

posted by : monopoly, 24 October 2007 Complain about this comment
The Vole that couldn't roar

"They also support sharing the mouse driver, display driver ..."

Has the Vole ever worked on a linux server??? I have yet to see a mouse plugged into a linux server (lol) and who actually leaves a monitor plugged into one too.

Has the vole ever heard of ssh or in its case putty.

Trust the Vole for such a statement.

posted by : Christopher Brunsdon, 23 October 2007 Complain about this comment
Absolutely...

They would never have sold it otherwise. Time-keeping is a bitch under VMWare if you don't have VMWare Tools installed.

GUI systems are awful through the console without it, too.

So yeah, it's sort-of 'please keep Windows' but it's also a necessity - they're scrabbling to catch-up.

It doesn't help their host OS requires more memory than the guests (if running Linux VMs), especially when you look at the flip-story.

posted by : Tom, 23 October 2007 Complain about this comment

Microsoft releases virtualisation additions for Linux

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?