I was going to comment on this article, but forget it.

If people don't know Nvidia's situation by now then let them fry their arse's with a bunch of Nvidian stock.

Do you people really think that intel is just going to play around and have a little fun with the graphics market?

AMD is a dead duck, plain and simple.
ATI is plain dead.
Nvidia has a bullseye around its neck the size of California.

Wake up and smell the Intel.
I fail to see how you can say the expense cost is "CRIPPLING" if I'm still making 57% more money. Is the stock market completely retarded? I don't care if my costs go up 100% if I make an extra 200% for doing it...LOL. IF sales are up 33% and profit up 57% who cares about 16% more expenses? The bottom line is I kicked some serious A$$ correct? The even lost 2% market share while making 57% more money! That seriously rocks. You are making more money per card/chip then correct? Clearly the 2% they lost was in JUNK ASP's that mean nothing or they wouldn't have made 57% increase in profit. Am I missing something here or is wallstreet STUPID? The author should re-write this as "Nvidia rocks the world with great quarter!"...ROFL.
it could show investors the middle finger and invest heavily into R&D and plan for the not so distant future, where integrated graphics will offer performance almost equal to dicrete graphics performance and nVidia will have no market ;)
Keep to the Sunday Sport Fanboy...

BTW did you happen to own Nvidia shares?

LOL
I was going to comment on this article, but forget it.

If people don't know Nvidia's situation by now then let them fry their arse's with a bunch of Nvidian stock.

Do you people really think that intel is just going to play around and have a little fun with the graphics market?

AMD is a dead duck, plain and simple.
ATI is plain dead.
Nvidia has a bullseye around its neck the size of California.

Wake up and smell the Intel.
I fail to see how you can say the expense cost is "CRIPPLING" if I'm still making 57% more money. Is the stock market completely retarded? I don't care if my costs go up 100% if I make an extra 200% for doing it...LOL. IF sales are up 33% and profit up 57% who cares about 16% more expenses? The bottom line is I kicked some serious A$$ correct? The even lost 2% market share while making 57% more money! That seriously rocks. You are making more money per card/chip then correct? Clearly the 2% they lost was in JUNK ASP's that mean nothing or they wouldn't have made 57% increase in profit. Am I missing something here or is wallstreet STUPID? The author should re-write this as "Nvidia rocks the world with great quarter!"...ROFL.
it could show investors the middle finger and invest heavily into R&D and plan for the not so distant future, where integrated graphics will offer performance almost equal to dicrete graphics performance and nVidia will have no market ;)
Its what you get for delaying your BS line of BS 9000 series cards that can't even beat your old 8000 series.