why does the inq hate wikipedia so, so, soooo much?

Who cares about the people who run it?
The people who run the inq are nerds, just like the rest of the people who run the web, just like the rest of the people who really know how to use it.

Wikipedia is quite useful for the common casual inquiry, obviously.

If it were not the inq being written to I might say that you ought to tone down the attack or at least get some facts... but it is the inq, and asking for moderation or facts is just plain silly.

Anyway,
you both serve your purpose, tools.
[tries not to fall under the desk laughing, then takes a deep breath and composes a serious face]

...Ouch!

[...back to laughing...]
Why can't some of these journalists out there (not YOU, Inquirer) have the strength and nerve to ask Jimbo a question like this:

"Your Openserving.com project was an attempt to democratize wiki community ownership, which was announced with great fanfare. Why did it so utterly fail to even get off the launch pad?"
why does the inq hate wikipedia so, so, soooo much?

Who cares about the people who run it?
The people who run the inq are nerds, just like the rest of the people who run the web, just like the rest of the people who really know how to use it.

Wikipedia is quite useful for the common casual inquiry, obviously.

If it were not the inq being written to I might say that you ought to tone down the attack or at least get some facts... but it is the inq, and asking for moderation or facts is just plain silly.

Anyway,
you both serve your purpose, tools.
[tries not to fall under the desk laughing, then takes a deep breath and composes a serious face]

...Ouch!

[...back to laughing...]
Why can't some of these journalists out there (not YOU, Inquirer) have the strength and nerve to ask Jimbo a question like this:

"Your Openserving.com project was an attempt to democratize wiki community ownership, which was announced with great fanfare. Why did it so utterly fail to even get off the launch pad?"