Is this article based on any fact, or is it just a bash on Microsoft and Pro-MS Sites?

Quite honestly, the whole article seems to be a waste of space, even if I do hate Microsoft.

"Opera 9.5 beta is buggy"..

What's the first word beginning with B in that sentence?

Maybe you should pass them the following link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle#Beta

Sorry to resort to quoting the wonkipedia, but hey, if even they know a beta release will have bug, it really says something about how stupid fanboiz are!

"64MB is apparently not enough memory to run a browser like Opera 9.5 comfortably and that phones with less than 64MB will encounter out of memory problems and crashes."

I agree wholeheartedly with this statement.

Having obtained opera 9.5 from a certain ***w*r*z site a while ago, I can confirm that while the functionality is elegant to say the least, it runs like a dog on my HTC Artemis (aka xda orbit; a device with no more than 64 MB RAM)

I hoped the "official" latest beta would address this problem, but, no joy. I guess it's planned obsolescence/moore's law/or similar that is to blame.

Not gonna buy a diamond or similar though, just for the browser; f*ck that!


errrrrrrrrrrrrrm, well blow me down !!! fancy an application that's in BETA being buggy and not working right, shame on you opera, tut, tut O_O

if it was a M$hite mobile browser it would have gone gold 12 months back and cost an arm and a leg lol :O)

internet exploder has been gold for around 13 years now and its still broken :O)