The Inquirer-Home
Comments
No Sneaky-beaky please!

I guess if the government are serious about overhauling the computer misuse act (or whatever it's called) I guess we, the British public should keep our eyes peeled for any attempts by the likes of the RIAA, or the BPI, or any other interested party to slip in (unnoticed) legislation regarding copyright, and privacy. The last thing we need is what's happened in Sweden in recent weeks...

posted by : AlexF, 11 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Funny how...

...all laws are designed to protect the 'haves'. Well, prehaps not so surprising, seeing as the 'have-nots' have, by definition, nothing to lose.

posted by : LeeE, 11 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Risky business

With all this apparent concern over computer security, I would think that the elimination of botnets - a la US Homeland Security - would be one aspect of threat reduction. Then, might I ask, WHY IN GOD'S NAME ARE UK SCHOOLS APPARENTLY SIGNING A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH MICROSOFT, THE MOTHER OF ALL BOTNETS (and without the knowledge and permission of the taxpayers whose money is funding this fiasco)? 

If the UK Government is REALLY concerned about security, walk the talk and set an example: install secure open source in schools and government offices as many other countries have done, and save the taxpayers some money.

posted by : Alfred E. Neuman, 10 July 2008 Complain about this comment

UK to upgrade computer law

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?