DTMF works for me.
'D', well that obviously fo DAAMit
a 'T' will suit for "THE"
I'll let you fill in the rest, but allow me to point out how most standard BS is revered.

It should be DMTF, not DTMF !

Too much PR, not enough product
If your products aren't selling. Distract the customers with changing the packaging and marketing info. Rename old Athlon64 X2, don't mention Phenom or Barcelona because business don't want what those pesky gamers might use/reject.

I've just read an interesting article on spelling (http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/04/25/inquir) and wonder if using the word 'vPro' in this form is done purely by accident, or the Inquirer had its small share from the overpaid cokeheads in marketing departments of Intel?

[Cough! Fixed - Ed.]

to the one true state-of-the-art... perception... it was always you

Looks like AMD painted to party pig with some greener lipstick! They tried this gimmick with Asus back in 2002 with the AMD Assured program... Which failed miserably... Oh and wait, they did it again in 2004 with Celestica and the "Validated by AMD program" systems... 
At the end of the day it's just a bunch of pig s$%#!!!!

Everyone ripped VPro and AMT (along with Intel's 'platform' strategy) when it was launched - once again AMD copies Intel's approach. There's good examples from recent history of AMD doing this: firstly through the ATI acquisition - for a platform offerring, AMD Live! vs. Intel VIIV and now through Business Class (I'm sure there are many other examples)...

I'm not saying it's foolish - if there's money to be had then fair play, they need to enter the market and compete - but everytime they do this, they prove Intel was leading the way & right in the first place...something i wish Intel would flaunt more often in the press!!