"I don't agree with the Ultra moniker being capped at 1600x1200, when people having the money to buy the best parts are very likely to be playiing on a Widescreen monitor."

UXGA = 1600 x 1200 = 1.92 MPixels.

versus

WXGA+ = 1440 x 900 = 1.296 MPixels

WSXGA = 1680 x 1050 = 1.764 MPixels

Full-HD = 1920 x 1080 = 2.0736 MPixels

WUXGA = 1920 x 1200 = 2.304 MPixels

While it's true that UXGA is not the ultimate gaming resolution anymore for most people, in terms of pixel count it is actually larger than the most common widescreen resolutions, WXGA+ (common for 19") and WSXGA+ (common for 22"). So, a machine that can push 30fps on UXGA will perform even better on typical widescreen monitors. Full-HD is fairly close to UXGA but there will be a small performance hit.

With a WUXGA or higher-res monitor you will of course see a big drop-off.

I think that some of the more negative posters are missing one valid point made suggested by the article here: AMD's new marketing ploy MAY increase the size of the gaming market, resulting in an INCREASE in the quantity and perhaps quality of the PC Gaming market. I think that this is a very good thing however you look at it considering the ever shrinking size of the market for PC Games vs. the continuing rise of the console market.

Wow some people takes their computers real seriously, Tommy you burst a blood vessel in your forehead there mate?

Anyhow I hope this helps get AMD more market share back, a competitive market is best for the consumer.

Get Ready to Drive Sales 
Take advantage of these great training 
and sales resources 


Get an extra US$50 in sales with every 
PC preinstalled with a qualified version 
of Windows Vista Ultimate 
When your customers purchase a PC preinstalled with a qualified version of Windows Vista Ultimate between April 7th & June 30th 2008, they will be eligible to receive a US$50 Windows Vista Ultimate Rewards Check* redeemable exclusively through your business! The US$50 Windows Vista Ultimate Rewards Check can be used to purchase any goods or services excluding Microsoft software and hardware, and can be redeemed up to 10 times 


MICROSOFT Just sent this out YEsterday. You can back pocket if you figure out way around. Null&Voids Cost of Case Plus fancy lights.
Remember 590 played Ultimate OK sort of except media Center was Limited, esp. dvd. So low 600 chipsets did Home Premium to wait on media center. NOW MEDIA CENTER Is in State of Final Fixes, I presume & however you can Warrentee One, gets you 10 times $50 or <-381$ plus tax. Anyway fine print gives fifie of your stock to customer, its that easy. 
So Lower Cost AMD Gamer for Ultie #1point or BEE DUMB, Buy XP & miss fifeee, Our LochNessie.
I Think XP SP3 should be extended & be same price as Ultimate & Be installable on as Many computer & partitions as Each Registured Owner can Install it on forever. Give XP Good Long Shot at Saving Oldieputers. 
Anyway this is about grinding out ULTIMAT Machine. Remember Dual GPU Vantage Scores are Hitting Final Score of 45,000 in Ultimate(c i told u 65K+ TS), So its NO Slouch, Scores went Thru Roof El Berzerko, So Good Chance Some Real Headliners Are About To Crop.
drashek von 
drashek REDBarronNestor.

This seems to be a winner for AMD. Good Job!!!!
There is only one thing that they might want to address. If the specs will be changing, they might want to also include a date on the sticker also. So if someone wants to buy a GAME! option system for the Extreme, they can see that the hardware they are about to by was tested with HL2 - Team Fortress and not Crysis 6 months later.
All in all, I think this is a very big win for AMD, I just hope they can stay in business for this to take off.
~ExIntel Employee

You can always expect the best platform to come from that ever receding mirage on the horizon. Go ahead and ask why punters get shot in the foot? "That's the way it's meant to be ployed, and besides, it's Narnia bizness!"

"You won't get a straight answer out of anyone mainly because they all have vested interests and no one makes all the key components. Except AMD."

WOW MR DAAMIT salesman! What a bold attempt at licking the Hector's ASS'et-light scheme wholly!

Lots of details indeed... coming from a true DAAMIT salesman!

What if intel/nvidia releases a similar scheme first? You'll just diss it out i betcha. Ignore the details as if nothing happened right?

"As long as AMD puts a little more transparency in the testing process, something that is very likely to happen, the firm has a winner here."
For you i guess... well i guess everyone's entitled at his own BIASED opinion...

"not to sell specific components or exclude competition"
but where's the competition's specs if this move proves to be a sincere move?

let me repeat the steps, taking from your (bleep) tounge that just licked Hector's ASS'et light wholly.

"The AMD Game requirements are an X2 5600+ (2.8GHz), HD3650 GPU and either an AMD 770 or NV 500 series chipset. Adding Ultra to the logo requires a Phenom X4 9650 (2.3GHz), HD3750 and an AMD 770 chipset. Both need a minimum of 2GB RAM."

i see no intel nor nv part here? does that mean both aren't qualified because they simply aren't AMD parts? i thought this is about performance mr DAAMIT salesman?

just a friendly reminder, i guess you need to take a break once in a while from licking Hector's ASS'et light schme wholly, your judgement is confusing you again... and again... and again... and again...

Since Intel has the fastest processors for gaming and NVidia has the fastest GPUs, this logo will serve the purpose of telling the hard core gamer what NOT to buy. If AMD can get back in the GPU game this summer with their new GPU they still are going to lag Intel's best chips for the forseeable future. This would have a LOT more meaning if this gaming "standard" was actually a standard instead of an AMD marketing sticker. Anyone remember Viiv?

AMD can deliver a VERY solid GamePC, for a very low price. And most user should aim at buying cheap and often. Wasting a lot of money on a single machine have never made sense. It's the same thing if it's a game laptop or desktop machine.

I'm a graphics developer, so NVIDIA is my pick of the GPU's. But if anyone is cash strapped then a AMD machine is the best deal. And it's been like this for more than 5 years.

Even if their graphics drivers have flaws, their GPU's are actually a lot more flexible and may have a much longer life than NVIDIA's.

Thank you AMD for reverifying that you are the only honest hardware company out there. You started it by challenging the MHz=performance craze with your model numbers and TPI. You debunked the "gotta have Itanium or your server is crap" craze. Now you have a good shot at demystifying a good gaming experience...... if Intel and Nvidia don't try to stand in your way.

they push quads because it is the most logical step up. there is a bit more bandwidth and who knows, maybe everyday people use a lot of crap nowadays. just because games aren't too multithreaded now doesn't mean people will just go out and buy new computers when they are. in a way, this is more future proof and the graphics card for ultra is better anyway so there will be a difference.

the windows vista certified fiasco was dumb from the start. everyone knows that aero doesn't work with all the laptops but microsoft and pc makers concealed this fact. 

on the other hand, amd is only saying it will play all the pc games of today and the past. standards will have to be raised but even then, whats the chance you won't be able to play any games? a 6600GT can still probably run UT3 at lower settings. It's still playable. 

AMD will grab a huge chunk of the market with this one. nvidia doesn't have the ability without a cpu. intel can't package nvidia as part of a "package" and everyone knows that buying an intel igp for gaming is a joke.

I don't agree with the Ultra moniker being capped at 1600x1200, when people having the money to buy the best parts are very likely to be playiing on a Widescreen monitor.

And yes, put these logos on laptops and see them selling like hot cakes. It's pretty amazing how many people prefer laptops to desktops, even when they're paying more money for less specs.

they should stick a year on the ratings like AMD! GAME!! ULTRA!!! 2008!!!! so that the specs can be re written once in a while. 
PC gaming needs a simplfied preformance rating system as it is so difficult for the average man on the street to figure out what will work and what won't. You can imagine that someone who buys a shiny new computer with integrated graphics and then buys Crysis won't be considering buying a PC game ever again.

it's funny how hard they are trying to push the quads (when most games don't use more then 2 cores anyway and when they do the gpu is the bottleneck.
but the reason this can only fail is because ppl will buy this only to end up dissapointed 2 weeks later when they buy a new game and the PC is not good enough anymore,also the fact that there are 2 types of AMD Game just smells like windows vista certified fiasco.

It is an interesting move for AMD. I hope this can boost up the market share on both CPU and GPU of the company. Additionally, I think AMD should make up this program for laptop (I know laptops are not the best case scenario for gaming -- but many of us do it anyway, right?). Because laptop segment is getting larger every year and with the upcoming "Puma" plus the "GAME!" program, I think it will has a great chance to smash that poor centrino into dust. And it also make sense in every perspectives.

the forger's printing presses will be working overtime to knock out nice shiny stickers for fleebay as we speak, other than that, nice one AMD :O)