The Inquirer-Home
Comments
An open format is NOT an open standard

For an open standard to take place: 

* All parties must agree on it.
* it must be free from royalty fees.
* It must be free from control of a single company.
AND
* it must be fully documented such that ANYONE can reproduce the implementation EXACTLY, simply by downloading the specs.

MS's OOXML is an open format by definition (although, even that's highly questionable). It is NOT, however, an open standard. A single company still controls the pace of it, and how it changes or develops. (What makes it worse, is that this company just happens to have a history of abusing its position in order to stay as the de-facto standard).

That's the difference between ODF and OOXML.

No one in the open source community is stupid enough to support someone who's being attacking them for a number of years now...Well, except maybe Novell and Miguel de Icaza. But that's another story for another day.

posted by : tumbsc, 18 January 2008 Complain about this comment

Microsoft wants open sourcers to write an OOXML translator

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?