The Inquirer-Home

Motorola and Cox claim data transmission world record

Hybrid fibre coaxial will never be the same
Fri Mar 04 2011, 15:51

A RECORD of 356Mbps for a 5MHz to 85MHz return path has been claimed by Motorola Mobility and Cox Communications.

Taking place in the Las Vegas area, the record was said by the firms to have been achieved by transmitting across twelve return path channels. According to the two companies, typical hybrid fibre coaxial networks today have two or three upstream channels delivering up to 70Mbps.

The 356Mbps data rate was achieved using a Motorola Docsis 3.0 RX48 return path receiver module, as part of the Motorola BSR64000 CMTS Edge Router.

"We are very pleased to show the results of Motorola Mobility's investment in Docsis 3.0 innovation," said Joe Cozzolino, SVP and general manager of network infrastructure for Motorola Mobility.

In addition to establishing the record at 5MHz to 85MHz, a maximum transmission rate of 141Mbps was also achieved over a 5MHz to 42MHz return path using six return path channels.

According to Motorola a 5MHz to 42MHz return path using Motorola and Cox hybrid fibre coaxial network technology will make it possible for cable operators to support 100Mbps in three bonded return path channels instead of four, leaving three return path channels available for other data services.

All tests were conducted across Cox's Las Vegas hybrid fibre coaxial network employing multiple Docsis 3.0 and Docsis 2.0 modems. µ

Share this:

Comments
Revelation

ITT: Cunts and white knights

posted by : lol, 17 March 2011 Complain about this comment
@kol

wow, ain't you got a nasty mouth. Did you create all that nastyness yourself for did somone put it in your mouth for you. You might be "tecnicialy correct" but your attitude is that of a 13 year old crackhead.

posted by : sllabymkcus, 10 March 2011 Complain about this comment
To the moron above

@Me

The article was published on the 4th, three days before your little comment. Things have since been corrected. Mbps wasn't used consistently and that subheading wasn't there.

If you're late to the party it's usually better to keep your big mouth shut, otherwise you end up looking really stupid.

posted by : kol, 07 March 2011 Complain about this comment
It is important

I know it may sound strange to some of the lowbrow commenters here, but an article should be looked over before its published.

And MB vs Mb is important. I read the first line and I think "Wireless transmission at 356Mb/s? Aren't N routers at 300Mb/s already."

posted by : poiut, 06 March 2011 Complain about this comment
Sweet

This is a pretty decent achievement, well done to them. Any word on what the transmit distance was?

posted by : Toby, 05 March 2011 Complain about this comment
MB vsMb

Yeah, which is it? MB or Mb? A tech site shouldn't be getting this wrong.

posted by : Jok, 05 March 2011 Complain about this comment
b in a B

Please be consistent.
b for bits.
B for bytes.

posted by : Danny, 04 March 2011 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?