Sat 22 Nov 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Porn knocked off top spot by social notworking

Enough with the sex, lets poke already

IN A SURPRISE move set to rock the Internet’s world, social notworking has apparently knocked pornography off its sticky throne, in what people search for most online.

According to 'data geek', Bill Tancer, top boffin at Internet tracking company Hitwise, people are no longer coming to the net in search of adult stimulation.

In fact, searches for porn have shriveled to only 10 per cent, going down from 20 per cent ten years ago. In other words, porn has been well and truly shafted. Or, the Internet porn industry is well and truly screwed. Or… [enough! – Ed]

Social not-working, on the other hand, has seen a real spurt of growth and is becoming increasingly hot. "As social networking traffic has increased, visits to porn sites have decreased," Tancer noted, indicating a change in position by the 18-24 year old cyber market. "Young users spend so much time on social networks that they don't have time to look at adult sites", he added.

Tancer’s hands-on research meant he had to sift his way through information from over 10 million web users. His findings are now being compiled into a book called Click: What Millions of People are Doing Online and Why It Matters.

Aside from the revelation that we are social, rather than sexual animals when it comes to our cyber pastimes, Tancer also discovered from his data delving that elbows, belly button lint and ceiling fans all freaked people out almost as much as social intimacy and rejection. µ

L’Inq
Reuters

Comments

Scylla and Charybdis

For some reason, I'm not sure this is a step up...
posted by : Alexko, 16 September 2008

same thang

either way, we're looking for cheap women

filthyrichmond.blogspot.com
posted by : braf thames, 16 September 2008

Hrmm..

Kids these days.
posted by : Sledbus Smith, 16 September 2008

Reason

That's because many of the social notworking sites allow users to chat on their webcams, and it's sometimes a lot more fun getting a real person naked than it is to just watch a porn star at work.

In any case, it's not like things are getting less sexual on the internet, live interaction with real people in the hopes of getting sex has just replaced giving up completely and resorting to watching porn instead.
posted by : John Smith, 16 September 2008

On the topic of Social Networking sites...

This morning Facebook has made the move to the so called "New Facebook", they've now forced all users onto the new system and as they say on the site, new facebook is now the only facebook.

I was wondering if any of you guys thought this was news worthy and fancied writing an article on it :)
posted by : Jonathan, 17 September 2008

Duh?

SEARCHES for porn are down.
People know where to find it now.
(Yarr.)

It's still the king in temrs of actual time, hits, data, and... well, I'll leave the last one up to you...
posted by : Anonymous, 17 September 2008

Surely because....

Surely people go on network sites because they can get their fix of sexual activity without dodgy porn popups(!), needing a credit card to even access the site, and probably because they may escape a nasty infection....pc wise or not!?!?!
posted by : Ade, 17 September 2008

Or...

People have bookmarked or learned by heart the URL of their favourite porn site so they don't have to search for them anymore ;)
posted by : Ianus, 17 September 2008

"Notworking"?

In the headline and the lead sentence we find the word "notworking." At the beginning of the fourth paragraph we find "not-working" (including hyphen) but later in the same we find "networking." And that's it for any of those terms here. WTF? Typos? A bit too many for that to be plausible, I feel.
posted by : Ted, 17 September 2008

Gutted

Its just a shame you didn't use your ordinary 'he ejaculated' phrase instead of 'he said'.
posted by : Steve, 17 September 2008

@Jonathan

Maybe you'd fancy doing a search and finding out what has indeed already been written ?
For example : http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/09/11/facebook-cements-look
posted by : Pascal Monett, 22 September 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories