SATA doubles its speed - again
IDF San Francisco SATA 3 at 6 Gb/s; Powered eSATA
INTEL DEVELOPER FORUM is usually THE event for all the Intel-related standard setting groups to announce the major updates to their specs.
SATA-IO group, overseeing the now dominant same-named serial storage interface, has toed the line too announcing the new SATA 3.0 spec, to be completed later this year.
The primary improvement is, again, doubling the transfer speed to 6 gigabits per second from the 3 Gb/s of 'SATA 2', giving us in excess of 550 MB/s net top obtainable speeds.
Why do that, when even the fastest hard disks barely touch the original SATA 1.5 Gb/s limit? Well, there's something called SSD. As we saw yesterday, Intel's new SSD drives saturate the SATA 3 Gb/s limit at 250 MB/s net read speed, and other new drives including Super Talent and Samsung ones are close to that too. Ten channels of fast flash can actually reach well over 500 MB/s with new ONFI dies, so a move from SATA 3 Gb/s to SATA 6 Gb/s would surely benefit the flash read speeds. As for the standard hard disks, well at least the reads from their built-in DRAM cache will end up faster across SATA 3.
At the same time, SATA-IO group also launched 'SATA Certified' logo to show full adherence to SATA specs for - supposedly - guaranteed compatibility. That is important as 99 per cent of storage drives in this year's desktops are based on SATA. Since the SATA 3 spec is fully backward compatible with the current SATA, including cables and connectors, using quality componentry at high speed is important to maintain that guaranteed compatibility and high performance, we guess.
Another interesting - maybe more practically useful - development is Power over eSATA initiative. Enabling power supply of external SATA devices over the current eSATA cables for easy USB-like use, it should see the light of the day early next year.
Besides easing the use of external hard drives, it will open up a whole new category of products like eSATA memory sticks, which can double as easily bootable drives and will be much faster than their USB brethren. µ

Comments
hmm
So 1 SATA disk cant saturate thisbut what about a raid system with like 6 disks??
surely it will help.
Will open?
"Besides easing the use of external hard drives, it will open up a whole new category of products like eSATA memory sticks, which can double as easily bootable drives and will be much faster than their USB brethren."Oh really?
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20080809/image/stdom1.jpg
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20080809/image/stdom2.jpg
http://www.innodisk.com/flashstorage_specification.jsp?flashid=29#tab_spqc
Been there, done that.
More Sorting w/Longer Now Faster.
Somehow this SATA standard advancement is being underthought. Sata3, TS TMSataN, is much better than mere perpendicular, which is oggle for Media Hound & priced well.sata3 is more stable system which larger code O/S & Softies' need, as mere 3 gb/s still wasn't enough to really get library pumping.Pumpitup&Spititout! Now Twice as Fast.
Buy Two Today.
Somebody gonna be even more challenged with SSD topper Light Miler. That is, If its Light & Within Miler o'so. All Is Mein. Mein, Faster, Mein....
drashek oxford/english whale killer.
For those that are confused
SATA 3Gb/s is 3 Giga bit per second8 bits is one byte, thus max transfare rate per channel (cabel without splitter) is 375 Mbyte in theory.
Going to SATA 6Gb/s ups the max throughput to 750 Mbyte/s in theory.
Probably only SSD disk will reach those speeds perhaps in a couple of years who knows.
Next thing to consider when using intel or amd southbridges is the transfer rates to the northbridge from the southbridge (ICH10R) they are often 2-3 Gbyte/s so its going to take a while untill a new bottleneck emerges when using software raid.
Other solutions might be a raid controller card that sits on a PCIE 2.0 wich has its lanes routed directly to the northbridge.
HardDrive 101
Today's drives have interface boards that run at what, 300? Trouble is that once the cache is full, then you are stuck at the hard drive's board-to-disk rate. A WesternDigital 7200 RPM goes around 92 or so per drive. Seagate and others, in the 60-80's. On a 1-1 basis, 92 < 300! RAID five drives and then you could be doing 5 x 92 = 460... and in this situation that 300 is a factor as you have more transfer rate than bus (460 < 300). So, going to 600 or higher per bus becomes very attractive!You really need to look at the Cache to Disk rate of your drive to really see your true data speed first and then worry about what your SATA controler is doing.