Sat 22 Nov 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Physicist hacks DNS patch

Emergency patch flawed

A BORED RUSSIAN physicist has successfully hacked an emergency patch designed to fix a recently discovered DNS vulnerability.

Evgeniy Polyakov reportedly used two desktop computers and a high-speed network link to fool the patch into returning a spoofed
address in just 10 hours.

According to Polyakov, a typical attack server generates approximately 40,000-50,000 fake replies before hitting on the right one. Polyakov also noted that if the port is matched "the probability of successful poisoning is more than 60 per cent".

Alarmed insecurity experts warned the patch could be exploited to redirect Internet traffic and collect user passwords.

The hacker appears to state on a Russian Bog, "DJBDNS does not suffer from this attack. It does. Everyone does. With some tweaks it can take longer than BIND, but overall problem is there." µ

LINQ
New York Times

Comments

cracked not hacked

When I read the title I thought, "oh, good." Then I read the article and I realized you meant he cracked an already existing patch. He did not hack a fix.

Surely those at th'Inq knows the difference for god's sake.
posted by : john, 10 August 2008

We all knew this

We all knew this was still flawed, just less flawed. As is stated in Dan's blog, it takes a lot more to exploit the flaw but it's still there. The only warning you get is that you would see a HUGE increase in DNS traffic.

This lets you know that someone is attacking, but it does nothing to prevent the attack.

Our bored Russian did nothing but prove the obvious. This patch only buys time, nothing else.

GZ
posted by : GZ, 10 August 2008

Po210

Them Russian physicists know all about poisoning.
posted by : Tweeker, 11 August 2008

Not Very Feasible

This attack is not very feasible in the real world. The critical nature of the original bug was that it minimized the need for a brute force attack. While being able to succeed in an attack on a local network over a GigE connection with full control over both servers is interesting, it's orders of magnitude harder to successfully perform this attack over the Internet, especially if you don't want the remote admin noticing. DNSSec is the long-term fix for this problem, but it may be rather far away.
posted by : Alereon, 11 August 2008

Bog?

"Russian BOG".. are they smelly Blogs with a touch of Vodka?
posted by : BogHore, 13 August 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories