Sun 23 Nov 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Comcast faces FCC slap over P2P throttling

Throttle off

THE U.S. FEDERAL Communications Commission (FCC) is poised to order Comcast to stop throttling traffic to peer-to-peer protocols such as Bittorrent. The internet provider would also be required to disclose how it had interfered with such traffic in the past and publicly formulate plans to manage its network in the future.

Comcast had not denied throttling access to certain protocols. At a public hearing in February, Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen admitted: " Comcast may on a limited basis temporarily delay certain P2P traffic when that traffic has or is projected to have an adverse effect on other customers' use of the service."

However, Cohen also emphasised, "Comcast does not block any web site, application, or web protocol, including peer-to-peer services."

Nevertheless, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin told the Associated Press that Comcast's actions had "violated" a set of principles adopted by the regulatory commission to protect consumers' access. Indeed, three of five FCC commissioners recently voted in favour of an item that stated the internet provider had violated federal policy by throttling peer-to-peer traffic over its network.

The FCC is slated to issue a final ruling at a commission meeting scheduled for August 1. µ

Comments

Where's the article?

Uhhh guys...where's the article? Just a blank page with a title and two ads...
posted by : Cuckahead, 28 July 2008

Tips Up

I think that SBC either delays or tampers NTP packets, for all of my NTP servers on its network seem 50ms off to other servers. SBC's own NTP servers (ntp{1,2}.sbcglobal.net) display the same behavior too.

Even though both Comcast's and SBC's networks are not public ones and therefore I wonder what the FCC has to do with it, how can I let the FCC know about this issue?

TIA
posted by : Augustine, 28 July 2008

Get em FCC!

Comcast definitely deserves the fines however we all know they are going to pass the cost of their fine on to us customers.
posted by : Axiomatic, 28 July 2008

P2P throttling maybe just a red herring

Take a look at http://www.cybertelecom.org/ci/neutralfcc.htm
or other sources. Comcast is not only violating FCC policy by throttling P2P traffic.

"Consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet content of their choice"

and !!!

"are entitled to run applications and services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement,"

If customers decides to run, for example, their own mail server or web server on their computers at home, then they are in title to do so. The fact that Comcast and other ISPs in the US are violating the second part of the FCC policy by blocking all traffic to customers' computers (servers) is far more damaging to the Internet. Any smart lawyer out there who likes to sue the ISPs and make a fortune?
posted by : Bingo, 28 July 2008

Lies, lies and more lies

---However, Cohen also emphasised, "Comcast does not block any web site, application, or web protocol, including peer-to-peer services."---

What a rubbish? They blocked my port 25 long time ago and there was nobody willing to talk about it in the whole Comcast.
posted by : Rafal, 28 July 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories