Sun 23 Nov 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Microsoft gags UK schools

Secret megadeal stays secret

THE THREAT OF REPRISALS from Microsoft lawyers has stopped Becta, the UK's technology quango for schools, from publishing the details of the three-year megadeal it agreed with Microsoft in April.

Microsoft already forbids Becta from saying how much money UK schools spend on its software. The US multinational has also forbidden the British people from knowing how much it is charging their schools for its software.

Becta refused to satisfy a Freedom of Information request made by the INQUIRER for details of the latest Microsoft schools megadeal, "after consultation with Microsoft."

"The documents are predominantly based on confidential material provided by Microsoft which was provided on the clear understanding that it would remain confidential," said Becta. I

f Becta, a UK government quango, published details of schools' Microsoft spending, it "could give rise to an actionable breach of confidence by Microsoft against us," it said. This was a "considerable risk", it added. There has been growing disquiet in the public sector in the UK and Europe about the ways in which Microsoft might protect the monopoly it has in desktop software, and thus keep its prices artificially high, absorb public money that might be best spent elsewhere, and suppress innovative competitors from breaking through.

Though Becta negotiated a secret schools discount with Microsoft, it also complained to the European Commission that Microsoft's anti-competitive practices operated even to the detriment of education. A UK analyst who asked not to be named, said it was possible to guestimate that UK schools spent about £55m a year on Microsoft software, based on a rare disclosure of a deal the NHS signed with Microsoft in 2004.

Microsoft did not want to disclose its pricing information to competitors, said Becta. Yet open source software suppliers, which are the only credible competitors to Microsoft, give their software to schools for free. However, there were other reasons why Becta should keep the memorandum of understanding (MOU), it signed with Microsoft in April a secret.

"Disclosure of the MOU would create a risk to Microsoft's commercial interests as knowledge of the terms of their dealings with us may put them at a disadvantage in dealings with other national procurement agencies," said Becta.

Microsoft is embroiled in problematic negotiations over separate MOUs with Newham London Borough Council, its public sector show home, and the Office of Government Commerce, which acts as procurement sheriff for the whole UK public sector.* Becta said there could also be repercussions in disclosure for itself: "We have concluded that disclosure of any part of the MOU would prejudice the commercial interests of Becta and of schools throughout the UK because the significant savings achieved under the MOU would be put at risk," it said. "We believe that our future negotiating position with Microsoft would be weakened and we would not be confident of our continuing ability to obtain the best deal possible for those UK schools that choose to purchase Microsoft products," it added.

That is something of a catch-22 for UK schools: if they disclose what Microsoft's pricing, Microsoft might not give such a good discount, but if Microsoft gets to keep its public sector pricing secret, it might help prevent new competitors from making headway. That is not to say that Microsoft has behaved uncompetitively by keeping its pricing and market size secret, even if it is the only game in town.

What business is it of UK tax payers how much a US corporation charges their schools anyway? µ

L'Inqs

Newham and Microsoft prepare another MOU

Open source UK attacks schools quango

Microsoft megadeal gets second chance

Microsoft clings onto schools deal

Gates offers free software in Asia

London Council unimpressed with Microsoft MOU

* More on the MOUs

Newham council published the details of its last MOU in satisfaction of an FOI request in 2005. Becta refused to do the same, but it shares one important trait with Newham and that is official confusion over its state of play with Microsoft. Newham told the INQUIRER in April that it signed a second MOU with Microsoft last year. It then said in an FOI response last month that it had merely extended the last MOU, but it has just started negotiations over a new one. Becta said in May that it signed a new three-year MOU in April, back-dated to January. It now says in its FOI response that there is only one MOU, which has now been extended twice since 2004 and will have run 11 years by the time it concludes, without a single person in Britain know how much money schools spent with Microsoft under the deal, nor at what price.

Comments

My school

At my highschool they let you buy boxed retail copies of vista ultimate for £65 and the new office for about the same. So it's not all bad.
posted by : Matt Hall, 08 July 2008

is that not ilegal

is that not illegal i thought the British public had a right to know how much there council was spending
posted by : william clark, 08 July 2008

It's the same with the wildwood flour

"Biscuits go soft when stale, whereas cakes go hard when stale", so this is now hard tack for the cookie cutter. Butter milk the deal, may leaven this gag. Cotton-wool kids shall not live by open sauce bickies alone, but sorted at sixes and sevens, whence properly shorn how. Bickies should be hard and not seen, as opposed to kids, who should be seen and not heard? How to rear ankle-byters, is to let them eat cake. Nobody expects a French Revolution, unless Nostradamus be trusted. The mains willing and The Channel don't rise. Dummy up for complete novices, or get the master class out of hell's kitchen. mou-mou
posted by : Larksbin A. Luney, 08 July 2008

taxpayer's rights?

It is time to put the boots to Microsoft's tampering and denying of the rights of taxpayers to know EXACTLY where their tax dollars are going. Is there no limit to the gall of this corporation...ISO, OOXML manipulation, telling governments what they can and can not do? Can you say *freedom of information act*?

Any and all details of government contracts are essentially contracts between the taxpayers and the agencies involved. If those agencies balk at wanting to inform those they are contracting with - namely the taxpayers - of the *details* of these contracts, it is time to INSTANTLY pull the plug on any further dealings with Microsoft. People have the right to know how much of THEIR money is changing hands, and also if this money could be better spent on open-source software, and on dealing with companies who openly respect their rights as taxpayers. Any politicians who do not support taxpayer rights are also not worth of representing those taxpayers. Speaking of rights, you can *write* your politicians, telling them you are pulling their plugs unless they pull the plug on Microsoft. End of story.
posted by : End of story, 08 July 2008

Great Story

Excellent journalism Mr. Ballard. The word recession is forefront of the minds of concerned taxpayers. Come the budget, public sector spending will be scrutinised and 'savings' will be made much to the detriment of the country in general. In short paying Microsoft vast undisclosed sums whilst also adhereing to their draconian T&Cs does not bode well for anyone east of the Atlantic.
I would argue that this matter end up in a European high court for anti competitive practices.
posted by : ciaran, 08 July 2008

freedom of information act

The freedom of information act overrides any commercial non disclosure agreement. The Inq could take this up and force the information into the public domain. Its public money being spent and full disclosure is legally enforceable.
posted by : 99flake, 08 July 2008

Bullmer.... Mugabe

Wow. that's intense. How can an american corporation gag a british government body from releasing spending figures. there would be other ways to get them, such as government oversight reports of such expendature. But it should be easy, it SHOULD be published on te net.

But to have them gagged from across the pond is just disgusting. You as the Britsh public should demand they release the figures, it is after all, your right as a citizen of that nation.
posted by : ed, 09 July 2008

Hiding information is bad

MS hiding the costs of their software and making it a legal fiasco to keep people from knowing how much it costs to get windoze and ms office is not a good thing. People will get pissed. Schools will spend tons of money. It's such a bad deal they really need to cancel it if they can.

It's quite obvious ms knows that the price of their software is not very savory to the public. Otherwise i'm thinking they wouldn't make it legal basis to let out the knowledge of the receipt. Again this is such a bad deal. I'm not surprised if they turn to linux and other opensource alternatives.
posted by : Shamil, 09 July 2008

Office is free at www.openoffice.org

Office is free at www.openoffice.org, try it out. It's just like microsoft one, only smaller and it's free.

FYI Matt Hall, your school should be teaching you that there are free-er alternatives.

Bill Gates is one of the richest men in the world but he is still happy to take money from school children.

www.openoffice.org - why not try it out? It also saves in MS formats so there are no problems sending it as email attachments *

* not a gurenntee!
posted by : interested_party, 09 July 2008

Freedom of information?

What's the point in a freedom of information act if the body in question can just say no?
posted by : Diazamet, 09 July 2008

@William Clark

NO NO NO! - the whole point of the British Democratic system is to support 'friends of politicians' - if you could find out where your money went you would be able to make rational decisions when voting and the system would improve.
Get back to cloud cookoo land and stop beleiving in democracy - you cant afford it!
posted by : Tom, 09 July 2008

Gotta love it

A private - foreign - company is telling a government body what it can and can not say. And said government body is nicely obeying and not even pouting about it.

Where will this nonsense stop ? Who will stand up and say "Enough !".

I don't know what I despise more : that Ballmer is dictating behavior to foreign government entities, or that said foreign government "civil servants" are actually obeying.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 09 July 2008

money for old (MS) crap

when i worked for LEA a few years ago it cost £7 per copy of XP, and a similar price for Office

I hope they're not buying Vista, that would be pointless and really stupid as it's obsolete.

Their best option is a flavour of Ubuntu, and Open Office, both of which costs nothing.
posted by : sarah, 09 July 2008

Please appeal as this is wrong

Section 43 can't be used to block information related to contracts after they are awarded. It's intended to protect the tender process so contracts being considered cannot be revealed to competitors.

Read the guidance notes at
http://www.foi.gov.uk/guidance/exguide/sec43/annex_a.htm
posted by : wayne, 09 July 2008

May The Law Be With You

Darth Simious: This turn of events is unfortunate. We must accelerate our plans. Begin landing your malware.
Nude Sunray: My lord, is that... legal?
Darth Simious: I will make it legal.
Nude Sunray: And The Inquirer?
Darth Simious: The Internet should never have brought them into this. Disconnect them immediately!
posted by : Soda, 09 July 2008

Contracts cannot prevent disclosure.

There is something very fishy going on in Becta. Under UK law, conditions in contracts that require breaking of UK law cannot be enforced under UK law.

In other words if Becta is required by law to reveal information under the Freedom of Information Act, it cannot avoid doing so, and if Microsoft took Becta to court or vice versa over revealing this information, the courts would simply strike off any conditions requiring release of this information, or penalties in the contract for releasing the information. Hence Becta and the schools have nothing to fear from releasing the information, unless of course Becta or the schools were part of an illegal price fixing cartel.

Hence, I just can't help wondering if Becta's real reason for trying to cover up the Microsoft is to cover up an illegal price fixing scam.
posted by : SPM, 09 July 2008

Why pay money?

I bet the Spanish Government is laughing all the way to the bank, and is having a giggle at the UK on the way.

Their government is getting rid of Microsoft software and putting Ubuntu (Linux) forware on 500,000 of their educational establishment's computers.

They are spending all those tens of millions on new teachers and more books.

If I were a British parent I would be very upset over this. Especially if learned that Linux OpenOffice software reads and writes to Microsoft Office files.

But I aren't so I'm not.

Ampers.
posted by : Ampers Taylor, 09 July 2008

Confidentiality

"Disclosure of the MOU would create a risk to Microsoft's commercial interests as knowledge of the terms of their dealings with us may put them at a disadvantage in dealings with other national procurement agencies," said Becta

This either translate as we got a really good deal and don't want the rest of the government to know, or, we got royally shafted.

I wonder which
posted by : John Imrie, 09 July 2008

Local Authority contract

The LA agreement I've seen for Office 2007 quotes around £170k per year for less than 3,000 desktops. Minimum contract was 3 years.
posted by : c radcliff, 09 July 2008

Master

There is a place in hell, for anyone that tries to take money from the poor.

See you in hell, Bill.
posted by : cruiseoveride, 09 July 2008

Taxpayers rights arent as important as M$

British taxpayers arent allowed to know how much of their hard earned money is going to Microsoft? Really?
Does the english government just write them a blank check and tell them to just write in an amount?
Most countries have certain rules about government contracts being handed out and KNOWING how much you pay for something is usually at the top of the list.
This is banana republc stuff.
And for the one saying that Spain is laughing with the savings they are making, let me tell you that Brazil is in the midst of a huge tech rollout program for schools and by the end of 2009 will have installed 52,000 computer labs (30,000 of which will be finished by the end of this year) which will serve 52 MILLION STUDENTS using various Linux distros (with the KDE desktop) tuned to their needs, curriculum and language.

I have no idea how much this would have cost them if they had to buy Microsoft products but I can venture.. A LOT !!!

On top of this, they control their own software and destiny because Linux is not only free as in costs nothing but it is free in the sense that you can do with it what you want (well, if you stay within the preset limits of the GPL).
But Brazil's turn to free software isnt just a question of saving money (although Im sure it played a part) but a whole mindset on how to treat technology.
England is nowhere near that.

We can laugh at how eastern european fraud and graft permitted those countries to overpay to use Microsoft but I see no difference in how business is done.

Im sure in both cases there are things that the public wouldnt understand therefore the need for secrecy.
posted by : rob enderle, 09 July 2008

Law trumpts contract

You'd have to hope that the law trumps contract and that Becta should still have to release the information. Think that act needs another reading.

And the idea that the information being out would harm their (Microsoft's) other dealings with national procurers suits me as a UK tax payer down to the ground. I want all the information out in the open so other agencies can hammer them for a deal if they are too stupid to use Free Software instead. Government should set the tone by using the most open products it can.
posted by : Alex, 09 July 2008

FoI applies

IANAL but I have worked as a FoI officer. As I understand it, commercial negotioations are confidential only while they are ongoing. As soon as a MOU or contract is signed it ceases to be confidential.

Accordingly, this MOU is subject to disclosure under the FoI.
posted by : Raphael, 10 July 2008

Given Away

I suspect the scandal unrevealed by the failed FOI is that Microsoft give away their software to UK schools, even pay Becta to promote it.

Sure they may charge a bit to the LA's for the grown ups but for the kiddies it's free.

How else could they ensure the next generation are hooked?

posted by : spannerman2, 10 July 2008

Information Commisioner

Make a complaint to the information commissioner.

It is in the public interest to know how much schools are spending on microsoft software when there is a free alternative in an open format, that clearly benefits everybody.
posted by : darren, 11 July 2008

FOI in Hungary

We here in Hungary faced the same problem described in this article. A NGO - named TASZ - took this problem to the court and won. You can read about this in english:
http://tasz.hu/en/news/101
posted by : László Kürti, 06 August 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories