Thu 04 Dec 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Stephen Hawking says NASA should budget for interstellar travel

Rising for the moon

CREATOR OF THE DALEKS, Stephen Hawking, has called on the world to dedicate a meagre 0.25 per cent of all its financial resources in a push towards setting up settlements on the Moon, Mars, infinity and beyond.

The world famous Cambridge University physicist made the comments at a lecture to celebrate NASA’s 50th birthday bash in Washington DC. Hawking claimed that it was essential that NASA increase its budget tenfold in order to ensure that in the event that the human race was wiped out on earth, due to nuclear Armageddon, the effects of global warming or open source software, we’d still be able to find ourselves a new life on Mars; or somewhere else in another solar system.

But, in true astronaut tradition, Hawking agreed that it would probably be better to start with small steps, rather than giant leaps. He suggested first shooting for the Moon again in 2020, and maybe a human mission to Mars five to ten years later.

Hawking reckoned that because the moon is "close by and relatively easy to reach", it would make a splendid stopover on mankind’s journey to the rest of the solar system. From there, Hawking ventured, Mars was "the obvious next target”, being rich in frozen water and weird alien rock sculptures indicating previous life. [Eh? - Ed]

"A goal of a base on the Moon by 2020 and of a manned landing on Mars by 2025 would reignite the space programme and give it a sense of purpose in the same way that President Kennedy's Moon target did in the 1960s" said Hawking.

Obviously a bit pessimistic about the future of mankind, Hawking wheeled out a rather cheesy cliché saying that if mankind as a species were to survive for another million years, we would “have to boldly go where no one has gone before. "

The best chance for human survival, in fact, would be Earth look-a-likes in solar systems nearby, the only snag being that, so far, no one has actually managed to discover any.

An alien, yesterday
An alien, yesterday

But Hawking wasn’t entirely pessimistic, because, according to his calculations, even if only one per cent of the thousands of stars within 30 light years of us has an Earth-sized planet where water could feasibly exist in liquid form, we should have about ten to choose from in our own solar system's backyard, so to speak.

So Interstellar travel is the way to go, and should be mankind’s long-term aim, according to Hawking who clarified that "by long term, I mean over the next 200 to 500 years". Sounds a bit like a local council planning committee.

0.25 per cent of the world’s total GDP would be a small price to pay for conquering space, reasoned the Physicist who asked "Isn't our future worth a quarter of a per cent?". Well, seeing how well we seem to be doing combating global poverty and starvation, the answer to the Professor’s question is uncertain, but maybe governments should have a think about it.

Hawking also offered his two cents on why we haven’t yet been able to detect any signs of intelligent alien life. Firstly, the prof proffered that any kind of life was a rarity in the universe, secondly, simple life forms were more common than intelligent ones, and thirdly and rather ironically, “intelligent” life tends to quickly destroy itself.

With undisguised dry humour, Hawkings noted that he found the second reason to be more likely, “that primitive life is relatively common, but that intelligent life is very rare," adding, "Some would say it has yet to occur on Earth." µ

L’Inq
New Scientist

Comments

open source software

Ohh the "open source software," commment was o sooo funny, Bill Gates u can second that notion!!!
posted by : Ajai Dev, 24 January 2008

picture

Has that woman in the picture got a beard?
posted by : Kokoro, 22 April 2008

OHHH SO LOW...

Hawking wheeled out a rather cheesy cliché saying...

Wheelin' out the Hawkster.
posted by : ZHall, 24 January 2008

ET intelligence does exist

Check out the interviews at projectcamelot.org
posted by : FocalP, 24 January 2008

^ yea.. props to the hawkster.. aiight

The irony is, the very technology we need to conquer space, will solve all our problems here on earth...
ie how to produce food and manage ecosystems in limited size closed-cycle systems far from earth, ultra-efficient solar energy collection, safe nuclear power (fusion, oh but that's 20 years away)... to name just a few...

Just about everything we have today in western society is built on the billions of dollars injected into science and technology in the cold war. We forget that... lets do that again!
The blogosphere came from another dimension however..
posted by : hawkfan, 22 April 2008

That doesn't make sense, steve...

Where will the money to fund our religious wars come from? And and and what about...the rest of the earthly conflict that we all pay for every day of our lives? When the nations of earth stop fighting and get their shit together (including us Americans, I'm no hypocrite), maybe then this planet will develop some intelligent life. Until then, those few who push for progression can sit back and just speculate.
posted by : Jake, 23 April 2008

The guys an idiot

Why worry about enormous trade defecits, huge unfunded pension liabilities, food riots, and global warming when we can blow $125 billion dollars on a moon base for half a dozen people. What planet is Hawking on? I'm sure those NASA boys were creaming themselves at the thought of all that money, but it's maybe time to get real and wheel Hawking out in to the yard and let him look at the night sky for a bit. Contemplating the distances involved might make him STFU
posted by : jonso, 23 April 2008

RE: Editor's "Eh?"

Gee, editor, never watched "2001: A Space Odyssey"? Don't remember a particular obelisk there?
posted by : SHN-Godot, 23 April 2008

Beyond Their Minds

People can and will do whatever and wherever their fantasies/rationalities/theories may take them. There is no harm in that so long as they do it within their minds or their mindsets. What a wonderful day it will be when the likes of these fantasists and their worshipfuls depart to their promised lands/planets/mind-holes with their banking and immortality accounts together with their medals, crownings, achievements, emperor new clothes and leave the rest in peace, war, famine, scandals, demonisings, copulating, druggings, goddings, gougings and more. Bets will be accepted at 1000000-to-1 that nothing is going to change. Why? Because, dear sweetie-pie, it’s ALL on the minds… and that of the minds cannot venture beyond the minds. Ask any chimp about arithmetic and you’ll soon realise what the minds are. A circle going nowhere other than one’s head stuck up one’s orifice. Trying to define and determine what Infinity is. A chimp os not a human and a mentally-driven human is not a brain-enlightened-driven human but they sure can piped-piper their groupies into a world of frenzy – of godding-their-minds.
posted by : sirkular, 23 April 2008

NASA AND PLANET X


*** NASA AND PLANET X
http://www.australia.to/story/0,25197,23040466-937,00,00.html
*** Google (www.ufodigest.com):
- Modern Science and the Ancient Writings on the Genesis of the Solar System
- Enigmatic Fossils - Darwin on Trial
- The Genesis of the Monkey People and the Genesis of the Anunnaki People
*** The book "Planet Eris and the Global Warming" (can be found at Amazon).
posted by : cristian negureanu, 23 April 2008

We're already there

We're already there, watch "Alternative 3" if you can find it.
posted by : Karel, 23 April 2008

Never comes the day

I think Mr. Hawking has begun to take himself a little too seriously. This tends to hold one in a low, safe orbit where the obvious can be applied as product.

Now, before I am fallen upon for this blasphemy, let me say that I am a fan of Hawking and have been for many years. He is… in a way, the second coming of both Einstein and Sagan. We definitely need more Hawkings to assure that our vision for the future remains trained upon the stars.

But back to the heresy; the problem is a generation-by-generation timetable that is always 15, 20 and even 25 years distant. The conquest of Mars was first conceived shortly after Apollo but… it didn’t happen. Instead, we opted for the Space Shuttle and the ISS. (The shuttle is a magnificent machine. Too bad the effort wasn’t applied to build a reusable spacecraft that could be used to explore the solar system, and not just an Earth-orbiting dump truck.)

Even the return to the moon is placed years and years distant when, in fact, the technology is there to make this a reality in far less than what is being proposed.

None of us alive today will ever see a manned mission to Mars. In fact, many of us who witnessed the Apollo landings will be long gone before the next generation moon explorers ever get off the launch pad. It will always be a distant land just beyond the horizon that no one will ever see.

So yes, I think Steve Hawking is caught up in the comfort and safety of the current vision. It keeps him an acceptable part of the musty mainstream. And that’s a shame.
posted by : Red Moon, 23 April 2008

We already have all the robots we need for interstellar colonization

One dollar in four hundred should do it---we can take the slow boats. Sylvie Barak is proof that we already have all the AI technology needed to colonize the stars at whatever snail's pace we can get there. (Naught but a machine could have so effortlessly assimilated all the Inq's quirks, slang, puns and queer sideways glances at any subject in so short a time on the job.)
posted by : Jeff, 23 April 2008

Good Pic

Isn't that a picture of the interior of Galasphere 347, late of Space Patrol, with legendary space pilot Larry Dart, Martian second-in-command Husky and Joe, a native of Jupiter and occasional visitor about the gyroscope-like spaceship?

I'll get my coat.
posted by : BigBadger, 25 January 2008

Hawking

As much as I admire Stephen Hawking, it is NOT appropriate for him to suggest that American taxpayers fund anything. Let him lobby the British government. Us poor American taxpayers are already footing the bill for enough wacky, far-out schemes, we don't need a Brit suggesting additional schemes for our government to waste our tax monies on.
posted by : Rich Wargo, 24 April 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories