Fri 22 Aug 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Yet another doctor claims mobiles fry your brains

Snap crackle and pop

A NEW STUDY CLAIMS that mobile phones really do fry people’s brains and that the industry should act immediately to prevent a catastrophic rise in fatal tumours caused by cell phone radiation.

The study, written by leading neurosurgeon Dr Vini Khurana, says that mobiles could end up being more deadly than smoking or asbestos, and that people should avoid using them if they can possibly help it. He also suggested that the cell phone industry take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to radiation emitted by the devices.

This is not the first time that studies have warned against the brain frazzling effects of mobile phones, nor the links between wireless airwaves and malignant lumps of tumours growing out of people’s ears, but it is thought that Dr Khurana’s report is one of the most damning to date, with regards to the blatant health risks he clearly lays out.

Professor Khurana’s study is a review of over 100 research papers on the effects of mobile phones. He has posted his findings on a brain surgery website, and his study is currently being reviewed for publication.

The report points to increasing proof that using a cellular phone for ten years or more can double the risk of contracting some forms of brain cancer, especially tumours such as vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) and astrocytoma.

Also, since cancers take about a decade to materialise, previous safety assurances and guarantees offered by the mobile companies are irrelevant. An estimated three billion people use mobile phones globally, which is three times the number of smokers in the world. Smoking is already attributed to five million deaths a year and Dr Khurana reckons that the impact of mobile phones will be even more devastating, saying “the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be far too late to intervene medically”.

The mobile phone industry, headed up by the Mobile Operators Association, have rubbished Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". The industry is still sticking to its mantra that there is no proven link between mobile phone use and cancer and says that Khurana's research reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

Europeans seem to be taking the subject seriously, however, with France and Germany asking their citizens to exercise caution with the amount of time they spend with a phone glued to their ears and the European Environment Agency calling on phone companies to make strides to reduce exposure to dangerous radiation. µ

See Also
Mobile phones DO fry your brains
People complaining about mobile phone masts come with brains pre-fried
3G base stations cause headaches, nausea - study finds
Study suggests mobile phone masts don't fry brains
Mobile phones safe for brains
Mobile phones can reduce sperm count claim

L’Inq
Dr Vini Khurana’s report

Comments

Blah blah blah

Heard this all before. I wonder which group of high-priced lawyers who want to become even wealthier on the backs of lawsuits against mobile phone makers and operators are responsible for sponsoring this particular piece of "research"?
posted by : Gordon, 01 April 2008

how'bout wireless phones?

kindda make you wonder if the same risk of damage holds true for wireless headsets. That's been in use for longer, so there may be more data to research with.
posted by : Sharku, 02 January 2008

It's obvious mobiles fry the brain, always has been obvious

I smoke, not much but I do smoke.

When I initially started, it took a bit of an effort to get over what I suppose you could call my body naturally balking at the practice.

However, if I developed something like a cough for example, or felt it was causing me pain, then I wouldn't do it.
The fact is - it's not sore, and it has a lot of benefits that are pleasurable.

With mobiles it's a very different story. On first use, they hurt my head, and on every subsequent use they hurt my head - very painfully. Even being near someone else using a phone also is extremely painful for me. I never get headaches otherwise and have no history or occurances of such pains.

So, when I had a mobile I only used it if I had to.

I find the whole thing very odd, either few people are actually able to feel what is happening to them during useage, or there's some big cover-up in the media not to report on what people actually say.

Given some things others have said to me, and that everywhere you go someone is using a phone, I think it's that they just don't care what it is doing to them.

ie - they hate life to the extent that they don't care / 'you have to die of something'.

Bleak.

It's not as if the whole technology needs scrapped - for instance you could have a reciever antenna on the roof for internet links, and have shielding on the underside area, and the cable just comes in at the router / modem - and it'd only need to be on and focusing the wireless connection during your being online - so the rest of the time it's not even linked.

It's dangerous / painful etc mostly because there's a connection between send and recieve, and the beam (the wireless signal) is passing through (is focusing near) your body.

Someone should do a test of brainwaves under different baseline / control circumstances, then compare it to brainwaves while using the different mobile signals & devices.

posted by : zupakomputer, 03 January 2008

why?

Why aren't we allowed to live in blissful ignorance anymore?
posted by : dotslash, 01 April 2008

brain damaged & non disciplined

so, if this is correct, it will make the youth of today both brain damaged and non disciplined at the same time.

LOVELY

posted by : shawn, 01 April 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup