Dutch political party sets up online manifesto
Wiki Politti
A DUTCH POLITICAL party calling itself “Trots op Nederland” (“proud of the Netherlands”) has apparently delayed the release of its political manifesto, because it’s still be written; by the public, online, in wiki format.
The party, led by Dutch independent MP Rita Verdonk, is preparing to launch a website which will purportedly ask the public to vote on what its policies should be, and then write them up in an online, wiki style, forum which will become the party manifesto. The site aims to bring people together to co-create political strategy seeing as they will be the ones affected by that strategy should the party win in upcoming elections.
The policy seems to be in keeping with previous statements given by Rita Verdonk, who said in an interview to Dutch news source Volkskrant last year that ‘Ordinary people have wonderful ideas,’ adding, ‘People can persuade me. I’m a good listener.”
But some critics have slammed the idea as belittling the complexities of the processes that regularly go into the crystallisation of political manifestos and party policies. They claim that manifestos are less about promising optimum strategies and more about being the outcome of political processes that have thoroughly weighed up the pros and cons of difficult decisions.
It is also argued that the wiki manifesto would make politicians slightly redundant, but one has to wonder whether this would necessarily be such a terrible thing. Maybe it should be decided with an online poll.
It should also be remembered that members of the public tend to run amok when confronted with a Wiki, leading to headlines such as 'Wikipedia celebrates 750 years of American independence'. µ
L’Inq
The
Next Web

Comments
Ah ...
... these political wood-beez, wishing it would be e-easy ... are they Green on the (Gart)side as well?OK, OK, I'll stop with the witti politti alreadi...
Politicians: protecting their turf
Yet again, the politicians are trying to scam the public into believing that they, and only they, know what is best for us, and that we, the governed, are too simple minded to know what is in our best interests. Not surprising, as most politicians are one, ego-maniacs, and two, failed lawyers. Its the knowledge that they are too stupid and insipid to make a living helping other people deal with laws passed by other useless parasites that convince most politicians to run for office.Of course, no matter how useless any group of politicians gets, it can't possibly compete with the New York state legislature, the crowned "Most Incompetent Legislature in the Known Universe". The problem is that all the necessary laws have already been put into effect, so in order to justify their salaries, and constant whining for raises, they pass useless and even downright regressive laws just to try and decieve the citizens of NY as to how necessary they are.
But then, the majority of voters in NY keep voting to send the same useless failures back to the Legislature, so you have to wonder.
a couple of bridges too far
I'm from the Netherlands and no, this party isn't particularly green. It was just founded by Rita Verdonk, the former minister of Integration who caught a lot of flak from left-wing Holland for finally tightening immigration. She was the one who had to decide that Ayaan Hirsi Ali could no longer be a Dutch citizen as she 'lied' when first coming here.More to the point though: I don't see why they have to go so far as to say that whatever comes out will be their party programme. Why not make it a place where people can bring ideas and think together about difficult issues. This can greatly help to create a 'manifesto' (I don't like this word, it seems too static for something that needs to be dynamic), but the eventual pages should NOT be the de facto programme.
Good idea, but taking it waaay too far