Fri 29 Aug 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Eurocrats hit Microsoft for $1.3 billion

For antitrust recalcitrance

EUROPE'S ANTITRUST regulators fined Microsoft an additional $1.3 billion Wednesday for having failed to comply with the remedies imposed by their 2004 decision that the company had abused its domination of the PC software market.

The additional fine is the largest ever levied on any single company by the European Commission. Together with the fine imposed after the original judgment, this brings the total amount assessed against Microsoft in Europe to approximately $2.5 billion at current rates of exchange.

"Microsoft was the first company in 50 years of E.U. competition policy that the commission has had to fine for failure to comply with an antitrust decision," the European Union's competition commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement. "I hope that today's decision closes a dark chapter in Microsoft's record of noncompliance with the commission's March 2004 decision."

In March 2004 the commission ordered Microsoft to disclose interoperability information to competitors within 120 days. Its antitrust regulators later found that the company was charging excessively high royalties and patent fees that effectively foreclosed rival vendors from obtaining the information.

In a press conference, Ms. Kroes indicated that the fine was calculated on the basis that Microsoft was in breach of the commission's order for 488 days. She said that the amount represented 60 percent of the maximum $2.2 billion fine that the commission could have imposed.

She said, "It was never a pleasure" to impose a fine, but characterised the commission's action as a reasonable reaction to an "unreasonable" price charged by Microsoft for information crucial to competitors. "This has had a negative effect on millions of offices and companies and governments around the world," she said.

With regard to Microsoft's offer of more information, she said "we don't want talk, we want compliance. If you cheat the rules, you will be caught."

She added, “This should be a signal to the outside world, and in particular to Microsoft, that we stick to our line.”

Microsoft's troubles in the European Union aren't anywhere near over yet. It's still facing two antitrust investigations there, one addressing interoperability and a second related to the alleged "tying" of unrelated software products.

The Vole said it was "reviewing the commission's action." µ.

L'Inq
New York Times

Comments

No honor amongst thieves

Some would applaud this as a slap against MS but I don't. If MS didn't have such deep pockets they wouldn't have been fined anywhere near this much. After all, if they can spend $44 bil for Yahoo, what's 1.3 bil in fees? It's pocket change to MS and an easy way for the EU to get rich.

Shame on them both.
posted by : Tom, 27 February 2008

MS is LOL at this judgement

Why would you care about a fine of 2Bil when it made you 50Bil since 2004 when this crap started? If I made 50Bil for every 2Bil I got fined I'd keep breaking the law too. At the same time their competition keeps getting weaker. If you really want to make this work they need to be fined something more like 30Bil. Also who is this money going to? I hope it goes to the competitors they've been screwing over.

This whole thing reminds me of MS getting away with the US Govt. convicting them of being a Monopoly (YEAH CONVICTED...AS IN GUILTY!). If you have enough money you can pay anyone to go away. It cost MS about 25Mil/state (well for CA, the rest were even cheaper) they paid off to shut up even though they were guilty. Again if you make BILLIONS for paying a few hundred million there is NO inspiration to play fair. On top of that they didn't even get broken up like EVERY other company that has been convicted. Instead, just a "thanks for some cash BillG and try to play fair. We trust you, you'll be good from now on".

Intel is doing the same thing to AMD. Convicted monopoly in Japan,Korea, about to be in EU and the USA still ignores is and refuses to convict...LOL. Our govt is bought off at every turn. At least the EU had the balls to convict and fine them. Intel made $141Bil in 10 years. For 4 of those years or more (Athlon for short time/Athlon64/X2/Opteron for 3yrs) AMD had a technology lead. Ask them how much they made...ROFL. Drove AMD into the ground with pricing and Anti-Competitive practices. What did we get out of it? A 20% hike in Intel server chips this quarter and now delays in Intel's latest Penryn's etc. Get ready to bend over for it Intel lovers. Don't get me wrong I own a core2...LOL...But all the AMD haters are about to experience EXPENSIVE chips for the next few years at least. So much for my quarterly upgrades. Looks like I'll be going back to yearly upgrades or worse.

AT adds: And... BREATHE
posted by : The Jian, 27 February 2008

Screw The EU Comission

Microsoft should pack it's bag, pull Microsoft off the shelves and tell the EU Comission to F*** Off.

Who in hell do they think they are - GOD.

There is nothing like a FREE market society. The best product will always come out on top. If they believe that they know so damn much, then let them develop an OS.

The tide is slowly turning against Microsoft because of normal market activities. Vista is a flop and Linux along with Apple is gaining because of a better implementation. No one needs these knee jerk commissioners trying to interfer with the free market.

Did I say Screw them....

posted by : Mike, 27 February 2008

MS > EU

It really doesn't matter what you think about Microsoft at this point. There has really been enough bullshit spewed out by the EU to see that the people running the EU are nothing but money hungry suits. I hope Microsoft doesn't pay the fines and fights it tooth and nail.

Hey, EU, what runs on your computers? What runs the day to day business of the majority of your world? Stop biting the hand that feeds. Businesses are the future, not governments.
posted by : deis, 27 February 2008

In other news...

... Microsoft announces across-the-board price increases for all products sold in Europe. A detailed breakdown is not yet available, but the total of the increases is pegged at about $1.3 billion.

The first year of increased prices will be used to pay the fine. After that, Microsoft will enjoy an extra $1.3 billion/year on their bottom line.
posted by : Jude Suszko, 27 February 2008

European Losers.

Microsoft should just say bye to the EU. Bring all its stuff back to the US/UK/China/Japan and sell it there. I would love to watch Europe turn into a 3rd world area, just because the whiny goverment thinks they can dictate policy.
posted by : TCE, 27 February 2008

Re: Mike

"There is nothing like a FREE market society. The best product will always come out on top. If they believe that they know so damn much, then let them develop an OS."

You can't have free trade when a single corporation owns the marketplace. That is why the EU stepped in, to preserve "free trade" ensuring there IS competition.

The EU is not an evil government and Microsoft is not a defenseless do-gooder. This is not the first time MS has been in trouble because of its business practices, althought in the US, since Bush came to power, they've sure enjoyed a nice ride over there, haven't they? Quoting /. Flipao
posted by : Radon, 28 February 2008

re: Screw The EU Comission

Free markets are vulnerable to manipulation by monopolies. A strong monopoly position in a market can be used to eliminate competition. This is what MS has achieved. History strongly implies that non-economic force is required to break monopolies. That is what EU anti-trust and USA anti-trust legislation is for.

You might recall that until the Republicans took control of the executive and house in the USA in ca 2002, the USA anti-trust regulator was proceeding against Microsoft. The USA proceeding were shelved because of political pressure... one wonders how much MS contributed to Bush's and other's campaign funds.

MS could not buy off the Eurocrats. Does this upset you?

If MS were to take it's ball and go home, it would certainly cause some pain in Europe. Then again all those municipal and state gov'ts would get stop getting MS slush to steer clear of Linux. It would work out after a while.
posted by : hoohoo, 28 February 2008

No EU competition

How about the EU create some competition themselves? They've been out of the loop since the dawn of the computing age.
posted by : BB, 28 February 2008

So much nonsense...

First of all, people why do you think the EU is going to get rich from a $1.3bil fine? What, you think the EU is some 3rd world tribe!?
And about the biting of the feeding hand...WHAT? Microsoft feeds us? Are you insane? Having the majority of the market doesn't mean that we have to worship them or to thank god that they exist...it means they have to be watched closely so they do not abuse their market position.
I'm from a country in the EU(the worst one though) and i agree with fining them if they do not comply with the law, but im affraid that MS will make us pay for it by having even higher prices in the EU than the US.
posted by : merv, 28 February 2008

Is blaps to the head for sure!

Nice to see the EU starting to flex its Brussels Muscles™ a bit instead of just outlawing eccles cakes sold in Derby.

Now I wish they'd turn their attentions to the camera manufacturers who charge $400 for the new Canon kit lens in the US or £180 in the UK. That works out about $360 and the lens is neither made nor designed in either country!

Oh, yeah, and Adobe too because any fule kno you can buy CS3 for $0.49 in America (in fact it often comes free on the cover CD of the New York Times or something) or €26,479.95 in San Marino.

Work that one out!
posted by : Piérre Euröcraté, 28 February 2008

Funny comments

The Jian I totally agree with you on your hurting companies where it really hurts.... their wallets. Heck instead of setting a set amount of money they use what banks like to use percentages .... like 25% of total earnings in which ever country they are found guilty for each convicted breach.... lol MS has way more then 4 breaches in any country/conglomerate out there. Then you would see some serious change and it wouldn't take 120 days for it get done.

As for the "There has really been enough bullshit spewed out by the EU to see that the people running the EU are nothing but money hungry suits." comment, your from north america aren't you.... isn't that really the kettle calling the pot black..... When it comes to money grubbing thieves I think the US has everyone beat.... what social systems do the states have in place.

The EU may be money grubbing in this case but at least they have a better way of life and reward their citizens more then the US does, get real.

BTW I'm Canadian not from the EU.... a socialist country that keeps getting more and more influenced by the US as the years go by.... I like my health care thank you very much even if sometimes broken.
posted by : db, 28 February 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories