Mon 08 Sep 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Qualcomm lawyers accused of 'exceptional misconduct'

Withheld documents, allegedly

SIX ATTORNEYS at Qualcomm have been accused of "exceptional misconduct" by a federal magistrate and referred to the California State Bar for discipline.

During pretrial discovery in recent patent litigation with competitor Broadcom, mobile chipmaker Qualcomm improperly withheld tens of thousands of pages of emails and documents from its adversary and the court, US Magistrate Judge Barbara Major alleged in her 48-page ruling on the case.

At issue in the lawsuit was whether Qualcomm had disclosed its relevant patents to a standards committee.

With teeth clenched, presumably, the judge wrote: "Producing 1.2 million pages of marginally relevant documents while hiding 46,000 critically important ones does not constitute good faith and does not satisfy either the client's or attorney's discovery obligations."

In a statement following Monday's decision, Qualcomm said it regretted "the discovery errors that occurred in this case." It pointed out that it turned over the documents as soon as it found them -- after the trial was over -- and said, "These actions defy any suggestion that Qualcomm engaged in intentional misconduct."

The judge exonerated 13 other attorneys who had represented Qualcomm and ordered the company to review its discovery practices and report back to her later this month.

Qualcomm lost the case and is appealing the court's decision. µ

L'INQ
InformationWeek

Comments

So they only found the papers after the trial ?

And that is not supposed to be understood as intentional misconduct ?
Fine, then it can only mean total incompetence. Have their attorney's license removed for life. And set Qualcomm a fine of 10% of their yearly profits for being guilty of hiring incompetent lawyers.
If it doesn't hurt the bottom line, it's not a lesson to be remembered.
posted by : Pascal Monett, 12 January 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup



 

Top INQ Stories