INQUIRER guide to free operating systems
Linux for Cynics
XP IS GETTING a bit long in the tooth, Vista is a pig and you don't want to buy a Mac and join the Jobs Cult. So, you're thinking of having a look at Linux, but are bamboozled by the hundreds of flavours and don't want to spend a weekend discussing it with disturbingly intense bearded men in socks and sandals. So here is the Inquirer's guide to Linux: quick, clear, opinionated and unfair.
There are scores and scores of minor players but only about half a dozen big ones that are worth looking at. We'll ignore all the single-floppy efforts, mini-CDs, routers and firewalls, security toolkits and so on, because they're specialist and there are too many to enumerate.
Which leaves the big, general-purpose distros, the one-size-fits-all, do-anything offerings. But first, ask yourself some questions. Are you willing to pay? If so, a bit or a lot?
Another significant difference is the desktop. Basically, there are two, both fairly Windows-like. GNOME is simple (some say too simple), clean and in places very slightly Mac-like. KDE is fiddlier, perhaps even cluttered, resembles Windows a bit more but offers more opportunity to tweak and customise. Your choice.
Also, it's worth saying: if you tried Linux a few years ago, it's time to take another look. In the Free software world, things move a great deal faster than in the big commercial software houses: releasing a new version every two years is seen as slow, stately and considered and several distros put out a fresh edition twice a year. Linux knowledge from last year is old-fashioned and from a few years ago is positively ancient.
So, in strictly alphabetical order...
Debian
Debian is the daddy.
It's one of the oldest surviving distros, partly because its designers thought
hard about the software packaging problem way back when, sorted it and moved on.
It has few frills, but it does offer a vast selection of applications, focused
on capital-"F" Free code. The snag - well, it's not exactly renowned for its
user friendliness. If you need the advice of this article, you don't want to
mess with Debian.
Fedora
You hear a disproportionate amount about
Fedora, because it's
American. Development is sponsored by Red Hat, the US Linux giant. Red Hat used
to give away its eponymous product for free. Since 2003, though, it's gone for
the enterprise market bigtime. The free OS disappeared, replaced by
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
which costs big bucks. It's well-liked by the sort of suits who think that
unless you paid more for the software than you give each month to the poor sods
who maintain it, it can't be worth anything. RHEL is what you want if you took
out a maintenance contract on the office loo. It's safe, reliable and staid.
If you want to try it for free, though, there's CentOS, compiled from the source code to RHEL, which Red Hat makes publicly available.
To fill the gap left by the end of the official free version, Red Hat created Fedora. It's a sort of free rolling technology testbed for stuff Red Hat might stick into the grown-up version later. With two releases a year, we'd call it an ongoing beta except that it's had some distinctly alpha-ish moments. It has lots of enthusiastic and helpful users, so you can get help fairly easily. For years, the official software installation tool, the Red Hat Package Manager, RPM, was very poor, lacking facilities that rivals had had for a decade, but it's catching up now with more advanced from ends like Fedora's YUM.
One problem shared by many free Linux distros offered in the USA and certain other jurisdictions is that they can't legally give away for free proprietary tools like MP3, Flash and Java - so out of the box, you can't open these kinds of files. A sign of the corporate mindset behind Fedora is its solution to this problem: it tells you where to go to buy licensed commercial versions. Very helpful.
Gentoo
Gentoo is the distro for
those who disdain Debian and Slackware for being too easy. The idea is that you
compile it all yourself from source, so ending up with something perfectly
tailored to your hardware. Think Vauxhall Nova with plastic body kit, LEDs in
the screen jets, an exhaust you could stick your fist up and a boot full of bass
speaker.
Linspire, Freespire
Linspire is a shiny
colourful desktop distro aimed at the pile-'em-high, sell-'em-cheap market. It's
designed to be basic, really easy to install and to closely resemble Windows.
Indeed, it used to be called "Lindows" and offered a built-in - and somewhat
ropey - facility to run Windows programs, until Microsoft sent the boys round.
It used to be based on Debian, but more recently has moved to Ubuntu - more on
that later. It doesn't come with much software included - it was cheap and the
company hoped you'd buy extra apps from their online "warehouse", where they
sold an assortment of software that's mostly free anyway. There's a free version
now, too, called
Freespire,
and much of the contents of the online store is free these days too. Both
flavours are pretty good on the proprietary codecs and drivers front, but it's a
relatively minor player.
Mandriva
Mandriva used to be
called Mandrake until its makers bought Brazil's Connectiva. Not much of the
Latin Americans' technology survived but a couple of syllables of the name did,
so that's all right. Mandrake started out as "Red Hat with KDE", when Red Hat
was still free and the dominant distro, and KDE was the trendy new desktop GUI,
which Red Hat didn't offer because bits of it weren't entirely Free. Nowadays,
though, Red Hat does offer KDE, since which time, Mandriva has set out
to distinguish itself as the friendliest Linux. It doesn't always make it but
it's a good effort. The main product is commercial and updated annually, but
there are free single-CD GNOME and KDE editions. The success of the company's
efforts at simplification and polish can be judged from the fact that there's a
free spinoff of it called
PCLinuxOS, designed to
make it more polished and easy.
Slackware
Slackware is another
survivor from the early days, like Debian - and similarly is best left for the
beardies. Compared to the others, it's dead basic - its startup files and
software packages stick to ancient Unix methods, avoiding the trendy bells and
whistles of younger Linuxes, although it's gradually gaining some modern
features like automatic updates.
SUSE
Novell has got into Linux in a big way, by acquisition - notably, GNOME
programmers Ximian and German distro producers Software- unt Syst
em-Entwicklung, or SuSE. Now,
SUSE is Novell's
brand of Linux. Formerly a heavily-KDE-based distro (KDE was also a German
project at the start), SUSE was best-known for its inexpensive commercial
product SUSE Linux Professional, a big boxed set with umpteen CDs and DVDs
containing everything you could ever want and pretty decent dead-tree manuals.
Novell's changed all that and now follows a more Red Hat like strategy.
Broadly, there are four lines. Open Enterprise Server is " reassuringly expensive" and bundles Netware services on top of a Linux server, which is also available rather more cheaply on its own as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES). There's also a client, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED). Basically these are the core, most tried-and-tested bits of the distro, bundled with support, updates and so on. New releases come every two or three years, to suit sluggish corporate timescales.
For cheapskate home users, there's openSUSE. (There are free evaluation versions of the enterprise products, but since Novell doesn't offer free updates, in effect they're sort of time-bombed demos.) You can download either a GNOME or KDE edition as a single CD image, or a DVD image with both, or buy it as a boxed set with media, manuals and a few months' support. If you opt for the CD, there are lots of additional components online. OpenSUSE is rather sleeker than the old boxed set and it comes with some codecs preloaded. Like Mandriva, it's based on RPM and new releases come roughly annually.
Ubuntu
Ubuntu is the brown one,
possibly because it's got a tan from hogging all the limelight. The name is
African, untranslatable from the isiXhosa but roughly m eaning "be nice to
people for a change". It was set up by a young South African called Mark
Shuttleworth who became absurdly rich by setting up a dot-com and selling it to
Verisgn at exactly the right time. After a US$20,000,000 trip to the
International Space Station, Ubuntu is what he did next, more or less his way of
giving something back.
Shuttleworth's original plan for Ubuntu was straightforward and similar to that of the abortive UserLinux project: to pick one best-of-breed program from each main category of application - desktop, web browser, office suite and so on - and bundle them up with Debian into a single CD, so there were no confusing choices or options when installing. The team picked GNOME as an easy, all-Free desktop.
KDE has a massive following of its own, though, and a version of Ubuntu based around KDE and KDE applications instead of GNOME quickly followed. It's called Kubuntu and has been officially adopted as a sister product, as have several other spinoffs from the many as-yet unofficial derivatives. The GNOME version is still the official main product, though, with a distinctive look based on shades of brown and orange, African imagery and sound effects.
Ubuntu is still a little raw in places - both SUSE and Mandriva have better setup and admin tools, for instance - but with two releases every year, it's maturing very fast. It's a smooth, polished desktop OS, with decent driver support. Due to its Debian roots and good design, software installation easier than on any rival operating system, Macs and Windows included. The project hosts a collection of many thousands of applications on its web servers and you can install any of them by ticking one box and clicking OK. This includes a single package called "ubuntu-restricted-extras" which adds support for MP3 and other proprietary formats with just two mouse clicks.
Sponsored by its multimillionaire founder, there are no commercial or paid-for versions of Ubuntu: all flavours are completely free. The company will even ship you professionally-made CDs for no charge if you don't fancy downloading and burning your own. The plan is that ultimately the company becomes self-financing by selling support and consultancy services to corporate customers.
Xandros
Xandros is the OS you will
meet if you buy one of the Asus EEE super-cheap mini-laptops. A distant relative
of Linspire, it's another Debian derivative, originally developed and sold by
Corel as Corel LinuxOS, arguably the first really simple, pared-down desktop
Linux for non-experts. It's still commercial, although a slightly dated and
slightly limited free demo CD is available for download. There are several
editions, aimed mainly at corporate and business desktops, with a new Server
variant that comes with an MS Exchange-compatible groupware server. Its main
claim to fame is that it goes out of its way to be Windows-like and
Windows-compatible. Its desktop is a modified version of KDE with a Windows
Explorer-like file manager and it can both join Windows domains and run some
Windows applications. A slow, corporate-friendly release cycle means that it's
not state of the art, but it's a good choice if interoperating with Windows is
your top priority.
Rounding up
Frankly, despite the embarrassment of riches, we reckon the choice is pretty
clear. Avoid the geek distros. Fedora is too experimental. Linspire doesn't
really have much going for it. Xandros does, but it costs and it's not flashy or
pretty. Mandriva and openSUSE are good solid offerings, but Ubuntu has them
beat. It costs nothing and you don't lose out on any bonus extras reserved for
paying customers. The free online support and help are excellent, too.
Ubuntu first appeared in just 2004, but already it's claimed more than half the "market" according to the Open Source Development Labs' 2007 Survey. It has more than twice as many users as Debian and about three times as many as Fedora or SUSE.
Ubuntu Server is still very basic - big businesses wanting a server should evaluate Red Hat and SUSE and small ones Xandros or the free SME Server.
As for the future - for now, Ubuntu looks unstoppable. Give it a go.
First time around, don't use a laptop - use a desktop machine with a wired network connection. Don't dual boot it if you can avoid it - use a PC you can wipe clean. Don't try something state of the art, as there may not be free drivers yet. Most hardware vendors are too selfish to provide free documentation for open source developers, so everything must be reverse-engineered. You don't need much - just the same sort of spec as for XP. Half a gig of RAM, although more won't hurt, a 2GHz CPU and 20G of hard disk will be plenty. It's faster and easier to install than Windows, and once it's on, all your applications will be right there ready to use, and it only ever needs a single online update rather than half a dozen visits to windowsupdate.microsoft.com, rebooting each time.
Look at it this way. It's free. If you love it or hate it, either way, you're guaranteed to get your money back! µ

Comments
Just don't Ubuntu
If you like "secure" think just don't use ubuntu. The ubuntu has so many think that need internet connection to show the power. Use other Linux. My optinion is Vista is getting better so does Ubuntu. But Ubuntu is worst than Vista. Of cource many linux distro better than Vista, but that's no ubuntu. Ubuntu has been more alien that vista. Ubuntu is copying from windows, linux, etc to make their apperance alien. My Dell D630 has been 99% ready to use in Mandriva 2008.0 with Compiz Fusion active AND GET HANG WITH UBUNTU =)) (Ubuntu is the DELL Linux Official).So? Choose your destany :))
linux is not desktop os at all
linux = less softwarelinux = less hardware supports
linux = bugs
linux = simple task will convert to impossible task
linux = use at your own risk
Ubuntu on Windows
Another way to try Ubuntu is with a nice idea called Wubi: it's an .exe that runs in your Windows and installs Ubuntu on your existing NTFS partition. Once installed at boot you can choose which OS boot from, Win or Ubuntu. It's NOT Ubuntu emulated in Windows, it's just a way to install Ubuntu without repartitioning the hard disk. Ubuntu is not for you? Uninstall Wubi and you're done.Be sure to serch a little on the Wubi forum for the right .exe to install Ubuntu 7.10, though...
commetn
Very nice article. Found enough interesting information although I've been using at least three Linux distro's. Respect!MEPIS
Sorry, you missed a very important Linux Distro. Debian is the father of Linux, but MEPIS is the father of Desktop Linux. It was the 1st to have an easily installable live CD with preconfigured multi media apps and codecs.MEPIS is widely acclaimed as one of the easiest and most stable desktop distros. In an artice for possible new Linux users, it is strange that it should not be mentioned.
Version 7 was issued yesterday, a perfect chance for those that wish to get some Linux experience to see what the latest and greatest of the Linux world has to offer
Porcine Vista
I'm perfectly happy with the ghastly Vista thank you. The one that everyone seems to like apart from the MS-hating poser boys and journos trying to make a name. It runs my software and it plays my games. DRM? Never heard of it, only an idiot would buy a DRM'd piece of media.The stealth linux
I know it doesn't get the media attention that the big boys do, but Puppy Linux (formerly PuppyOs)is small, easy to use, and 'Just Works(TM)'.
It is designed from the ground up to be user friendly, simple to run and runs on almost any hardware. (If it'll run Windows 95, it'll usually run Puppy)
Puppy's first bootup offers help tips onscreen, and automatically launches a help page. Plus, it's use of wizards makes setup a snap, and its user community rivals Ubuntu's.
One of its many sites, and one of the best, is http://puppylinux.ca/ .
Btw, I have nothing to do with Puppy, other than being a very happy user. :)
Overspecced...
"You don't need much - just the same sort of spec as for XP. Half a gig of RAM, although more won't hurt, a 2GHz CPU and 20G of hard disk will be plenty."K/ubuntu "feisty" (7.0.4) running fine here on a 900 MHz Slot TBird (Athlon), with 512MB RAM, 10-g partition (with separate, 1g swap).
I don't imagine xp would run very well on that -- Nt4 and 2K both run fine on it.
Dual monitors (Radeon 7000) and wacom tablet enabled.
I did a dual boot too (Linux boot loader on floppy, to avoid complications). Anyone who has run multiple versions of Windows could probably manage it.
My preference is for KDE as it 'seems' more sophisticated than gnome (even though certain features e.g. windows volume mounting, and printing, are actually less well developed, atm).
kinda boring
hoorah for linux, but what can it do?IMHO Leopard is the best option right now. It looks good, plenty secure, software is el cheapo and muy fantastico, better overall feel than Vista, but you can easily run XP on the side for the games.
I'd really like to use Linux. I love the idea of it, but if you want to use your computer for more than a web browser and a word processor... it just isn't there for you with the lack of 3rd party apps.
Anyway, Windows will always be king as long as the other OS's cannot play video games. If you find yourself arguing with this statement you are... just... plain... wrong.
In a year or so Vista will have 50% market share because video games will no longer run on XP, 2 years from now Vista will be ubiquitous and XP will be on the way out. The only way to dethrone MS is by offering a competitive video games solution, an alternative to DX... and good luck with that.
Debian
Debian is as user-friendly as Ubuntu. It has a great world-wide network of developers and maintainers, a ton of mirrors, apt packaging and GNOME or KDE. There is little operation difference. Debian is available on more architectures and has far more packages available.see http://debian.org
Nice article
After playing with 20 different variations of linux I've come to the same conclusion. There is also a huge support base for ubuntu as well.Suggestion to those trying to find solutions using a search engine search by build version or build name (ex: dapper, edgy, feisty, gutsy,... soon hardy)
Merry Christmas to all :D
Wot? No BSD?
Wot? No BSD?Trying Ubuntu
Ubintu's new distros no longer come in an 'install' and 'live' version. Instead you get just a single disk. You boot the system from the CD into a Linux desktop, the installation being an application you can run from that desktop. This is a very ingenious arrangement that really allows you to 'try before you buy'. The installation is smooth, with the disk partition being a lot better organized than I'm used to.As a bonus if you put the distro CD into a Windows system it will run up a selection of popular applications such as Firefox.
MMmkay
I might just do Ubuntu...I tried, I believe, mandrake version 6, 7, 8? So many years ago and, at that point, would rather take chances with windows' fleeting stability.
Wish me luck!
What about Live CD's
I'm surprised you did not mention you can download a live CD of most distributions. A live CD allows you to boot your PC from the CD and run the distribution from the CD without making any changes to your PC.This is far more flexible than manually installing each distribution to find one you like.
E.g. If you don't like ubuntu's interface, just bin the CD and try kubuntu, PCLinuxOS or one of the other distributions.
not the only free one
Hi. I hope your article has a follow up with other free OSs like *BSDs :)Ubuntu has Mate Support
Additional plus for Ubuntu: it's trendy. This is an advantage because you're more likely to have friends who are using it and can help with the stickier bits. Sort of like the Windows Mate Support option.A bump for SuSE
I've found windows users more comfortable using the KDE centric OpenSuSE offerings. I myself find Ubunto fine for something akin to kiosk, install it and never change it set ups, but with its extensive repositories, and very easy setup and configuration applets (think windows control panel), SuSE has been my personal choice for a number of years, and the distro I most heartily reccommend to others.On another note, I recently got a new Dell 1720 laptop (1920 x1200 screen, Intel HDA audio, and Intel 4965 802.11n WiFI), and SuSE is the only distro I got to boot up properly on it, AND by going with some of the newer kernels available in the repository, had EVERYTHING working in less then an hour.
One thing I do have to say about Ubunto, is that there seems to be a lot more on-line discussions specific to solving issues with Ubunto then any other distro. I don't think this is so much a statement about Ubunto vs any other distro, just that there are perhaps a lot more people getting their first look at Linux by way of Ubunto.
Thanks for a great and well thought out article. Just felt obliged to "bump" the option of SuSE.
Can't find it
Nice article, not 100% correct in distro description, but the final statement is true :)One little remark, in Gentoo you don't compile , it's done automatically by packaging system. not more complicated then deb or rpm. It takes considerably more time, but you gain 15-30% performance boost
Brilliant!
The review is brilliant except I don't like the notion that Fedora is very geeky and always in the alpha-beta stage. I've been using it for the last 5 years (even more considering I started with RH 7.1) and I'm almost satisfied by it.If you want some proprietary things and good advice, read here: http://www.fedorafaq.org/
One luser's bitter experience...
... was that, for an ignorant, lazy guy whose mind has been rotted by years of Windows addiction, several successive versions of SuSE have installed smoothly alongside my W2K and XP partitions. Whereas Ubuntu (Gutsy Gibbon) cheerfully overwrote both my user data partitions first time I tried to install it. So I'm sticking with the arguably more idiot-proof SuSE.Yet again that gutsy gibbon ate the bannanas
You should have left recommendation out of this otherwise good article.Choosing a Linux flavour is more than a "It's getting better year after year" point.
My experience with Ubuntu was fairly short and dramatic on both a decent desktop and laptop machines. First had troubles finding the proper ATi drivers (until I figured out ATi's site could be helpful after all) and second, oh my it's a laptop (that should be explanatory enough, but read on :))
If you ever get to install a software Intel/ATi soundcard-based modem and run into a "this kernel for having wireless support and that kernel for the usb flash devices" problem you might just get close to realising why Ubuntu (and Linux for that matter) is still not that polished everyone wishes.
Gnome - ye it's pretty, but it doesn't have a decent archive and file manager, nor media player, it has GTK and so on (and in Ubuntu's case - it doesn't even come with MP3/4/DivX support!)
Frankly I still can't realise why did they choose (for their main distro) that non-standart, everything-but-convinient shell instead of the Windows-like, much more beautifull KDE which everyday users can learn in a matter of hours. And don't sell me that "KDE is a resource hog" stuff - unless you do have an old Dell PC with "Designed for Windows 95 logo" or something like - newer versions of KDE can run smooth enough on every decent PC.
My point is - avoid awarding that gutsy winner until you've tried it on more than one platform (and keeping in mind the average computer experience of the general audience these days)...
P.S. My personal choice for near user-friendly desktop Linux is PCLinux OS.
Gentoo?
Why use all the automated scripts of Gentoo? Real men do LFS...as in http://www.linuxfromscratch.orgHey and you might just learn something along the way
Erroneous Information about Red Hat
The author has stated that Red Hat is not Free, but charges big bucks. Wrong.It is as free, but to have Red Hat support, but then you are looking at distros that are one year behind the bleeding edge distributions. One year is reasonable time to make certain that all the bugs are shaken out.
You can actually download the Red Hat linux or the equivalent CentOS, which is slightly ahead of Red Hat in new features.
Fedora is the testing ground for new Linux features.
Other great distributions are UBUNTU, SUSE, PCLINUXOS, Mandriva and up and coming ones from China
Distro for ones first jump
Something to remember is that Linux is different. Too different for most to be able to make full use of or be as happy as they were with Windows, atleast at first. I have no issues with dual booting Fedora or or Unbuntu (infact Debian set it up for me), but I also have learned enough about Linux and Windows to make everything work on the same system. The biggest thing with Linux is to learn to look things up ("Howto +what you need" in google). You'll be speaking a different language (unless coming from a Mac background), but there is documentation all over the place to learn it.If you're looking to try Linux, but aren't comfortable with making a complete blind leap in killing Windows and fully installing Linux, there are alternatives. Look into Knoppix. Knoppix is a Debian based distro that runs from a CD or DVD with no install needed. Just download, burn it to a disc, and then boot the PC from the disc. When you're ready to go back to Windows reboot and remove the disc. Windows will still be there, and be untouched. Also, Knoppix is designed for people who have little or no knowledge of how anything in a computer works - grandma can use it.
After the above if you wish to try another distro, just Google the distro name + "LiveCD". You will end up finding another distro that will run from disc.
Even if you decide that you don't want to use Linux full time I still strongly recommend you use a "Live" distro like Knoppix for web surfing and email. Distro's like Knoppix run from a disc and RAM. When you restart the computer everything that made it onto the computer will disappear. This means that you are nearly immune to spam, spyware, and 99.999% of all viruses. Hows that for identity protection?
Even if none of the above is your thing, a Live distro allows you to use a computer without a hard drive. This can make for a fast and functional web and email machine. Beyond this if your Windows installation crashes you can use a Live distro to recover files.
I know this has been a book, but a little extra info never hurts. As a system admin Live distros have helped me out greatly, and my users love them for keeping the evil spyware man away. I figure that others will feel the same.
--John
great guide
thanks for the guide, showed it to many friends and family members, very happy with the adviceI would say
If You beginning the Journey with Linux - Ubuntu (because of great support) or SuSe (because of friendliness but still with some hidden power) would be best for You.If You have some experience and would like to try something new: Slackware (my fav), Gentoo (You'll need time to handle this one), or Sabayon (pre-prepared Gentoo).
If You are pretty well experienced, You don't have to read such articles in first place :) second, I'd recommend You FreeBSD. After Years with many linux distro's, I found in BSD what I think linux lost some time ago when started to get more popular - that strange magic which drives Your curiosity, and put fun back into mastering system on Your own.
Ubuntu is easier
I started with fedora 1 ,I leaned lotsa things about linux with it, but starting fedora 4 I've found some problems with application RPM packageI moved to Ubuntu and it's so elgantly designed (using apt-get ,dpkg,synaptic ,aptitude for packaging) and there's lots of ready to install binaries out-there
reply to "games"
the statement "Linux don't have games" is wrong
yes there are not millions of games that can run on LINUX but at least there are hundreds (yep hundreds) I won't tell you were to find theme (if u search you can get them)
but wait if you want to play alot of games that bad then buy a game-console instead :-/
http://www.dotcoma.it
I find Ubuntu simply wonderful, not to mention simple, not to mention that everything works, not to mention that software updates are frequent and incredibily easy etc etc etc.Some Confusion
"linux is not desktop os at all= less software, = bugs, = use at your own risk "
WTH? Try more software - with programming tools any one can get and use how could there not be? (Check out Sourceforge) Bugs? All software has bugs, at least with open software there are many eyes to find flaws; proprietary relies on those who's living is based on NOT finding flaws. Risk? All software is a risk - in lost time, lost data etc. No single company will pay you back for lost data or time ... try it and get the best set of laughs.
"IMHO Leopard is the best option right now. It looks good, plenty secure, software is el cheapo and muy fantastico, better overall feel than Vista, but you can easily run XP on the side for the games."
Security has nothing directly to do with the OP System - only the user. A user can harden an MS System as hard as any OS/X setup - it just takes experience and time. There are viruses for OS/X, with more coming every day. There have been viruses for Linux for a long time - it's just with Wintel there are so many unknowns (proprietary) that it's very hard to find and plug all the holes in the dike.
Games specifically - I run WINE under Fedora and have World of Warcraft, The Burning Crusade, running beautifully. I also have that machine triple booted for compatibility; a few things won't run on XP nor WINE, so I have one of my old copies of 98 on there too.
I have been giving out CD's of Knoppix and Ubuntu to friends and family who are non-geeks. I myself prefer Slackware, I've known and used it since v 2.04. The biggest thing about distro and version relate to time you are going to put in. Not much? Go with a live cd version. Lots? Go with a full install from bottom up.
I am disappointed no others (FreeBSD, Solaris etc) were mentioned. Ces't La Vie
Arch!
You're missing the best one: Arch Linux! ;-)Although, "best" is just an opinion; there's a distro for everyone. That's what is great about Linux - so many flavors. I spent two years searching for the perfect distro: Ubuntu, Debian, Damn Small, Suse, Gentoo, and then finally found the one which was everything I wanted.
You're so wrong about Debian being hard though!
Linux getting better
I had to try seven distros before I found one that would work on my laptop. Mandriva 2008.1 is the one that worked on my Acer 5315. When you find the right distro, it makes all the difference in the world.