Fri 08 Aug 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

INQ Guide to free anti-virus software

Windows for Doughnuts Free anti-virus

THIS IS ONE of the most critical components of the setup of any PC today. A machine doesn't need to be on the Web to be at risk; there are decades-old viruses that can still spread by disk transfer, and new ones that can infect USB thumbdrives.

Direct infection across local-area networks is also a common problem; someone takes a laptop outside the company LAN, picks up something nasty in an Internet Café, later on reconnects in the office and the bug is on the rampage.

Companies such as Symantec and McAfee make good money selling anti-virus solutions, both to big businesses and to home users. If you buy a new PC from one of the big vendors, it's quite likely to come with some kind of anti-virus preloaded, but all too often, it's only a trial or demonstration version, and after a month or three it will stop working. Generally, the program still runs but it no longer gets updated definitions.

A common misconception is that an anti-virus program will protect against spyware too. Most do not. We'll look at anti-spyware in a later article.

But my old copy of Norton works fine
A common trap to fall into is to just keep renewing the updates subscription for a commercial program. In a word: don't. Get a new version.

New types of virus appear constantly, as today, they're big business: collections of infected, remotely-controlled computers are used for sending spam and for organizing "distributed denial of service" attacks, where business sites such as online betting shops are held to ransom. It's not a lucrative business on a per-PC basis, but today, one of the biggest supercomputers in the world is a "botnet" - a team of millions of compromised PCs, remotely controlled from illegal websites and chatrooms. With such resources at their disposal, crooks can make a good profit. If you can send several million spams a day, even a success rate of 0.01% can make a lot of money from hapless idiots who think that a pill can make them taller or a bodypart grow bigger.

The snag is that an out-of-date anti-virus program, even with the latest definitions, can't catch the new viruses that later versions have been rewritten to spot and remove. Obsolete anti-virus is worse than none, because it imbues you with a false sense of security. Users think they're protected - the past-it program may be giving their PC a clean bill of health - but actually, they could be infested.

Many of the leading commercial anti-virus tools can be upgraded over the counter for half the cost of buying that years' new update, but why bother, when you can get protection for free?

When choosing a free anti-virus program, there are some important things to watch out for. The essential features of a full anti-virus program are real-time monitor and some kind of virus removal procedure. Several companies offer free scanners, but a scanner alone is not enough. For one thing, while it's useful to be able to scan your computer as a check, a simple scanner doesn't sit in the background and monitor file activity on your PC, so it won't notice if you receive an infected file by email or instant message, or insert an infected disk. This is called real-time monitoring and it's a must-have.

Secondly, some free programs will tell you that you've caught something nasty, but they lack any ability to remove what they've found. There are three main ways to treat an infected file: simply delete it, the easiest and safest; or to quarantine it, move it into a protected safe storage area where it can do no harm, for later inspection or salvage; or finally disinfection, which attempts to remove the virus from a document or program and leave you with a safe, usable file. This last is the hardest to do successfully, and whereas it can sometimes work, it's safer and better to bin the dodgy doc and get a clean copy from elsewhere - like your backups. You do keep backups, don't you?

There's no harm in having a scanner, but it can only be a second line of defence, to be used to verify that your main program is telling the truth and that you really are clean.

Czech this out
For some reason, the Czechs dominate the world of free antivirus. Both the best-known program, AVG Free from Grisoft, and the highly-regarded runner-up, Avast Home from Alwil, are from the Czech Republic. In the country next door is Avira in Germany with its free AntiVir.

All have the same snag: they're only free for non-commercial use. For home, personal or nonprofit users, they're a bargain, but business users must pay a modest fee or look elsewhere. Avast has, if anything, the best reputation, but has the slight snag that the free download only works for a couple of months. To use it for longer, you must register with a valid email address, and re-register annually.

Along with their free firewalls, both PC Tools and Comodo also offer a free antivirus program. Both cover the essentials and the websites don't mention any riders about business use.

The only big open-source offering in anti-virus is ClamWin, the Windows version of ClamAV, the popular Linux scanner used on many email servers. It's kosher for use in corporate environments, but it doesn't do real-time monitoring, as this isn't a problem on Linux.

An example of the hazards of spyware is VCatch, a rather ineffective free antivirus program with a nasty payload. Avoid. µ

L'Inqs
AVG Free 7.5 from Grisoft
Avast Home from Alwil
PC Tools Free Antivirus
Comodo Free Antivirus
- note, still in beta test.
Avira AntiVi

For belt-and-braces security, here are some decent scanners to check that you really are clean.
ClamWin
BitDefender Free (Download here.)

Online scanners. These run inside Internet Explorer, so need no download or installation.
McAfee FreeScan
Panda ActiveScan

Comments

NOD 32

Nod 32 is the best virus protection program hands down. I'm very surprised this was not in the article.
posted by : Thrikreen, 03 October 2007

You're wrong

ClamAV has a realtime scanner.
Check this one !
http://www.moonsecure.com
Look at the "Info About Moon Secure" section

Regards

Obi
posted by : Obi, 04 October 2007

Inq Guide to Free AV

I thought that was a good article you wrote on the free AV programs. A few points deserve to be expanded upon. Antivirus programs detect *hardly any* spyware, and Trojans have proliferated as a result.

Even in their specialty area - there's no single AV program that will protect you against every virus. Personally, I run two free AV programs - Avast & Bitdefender. The important thing when running two, is to only allow one of them to use active scanning / resident protection. Otherwise they start fighting over your files. I use the other one for a weekly check against the other.

Lastly, well-known standard AV solutions often have a nasty drawback - and that is that specialised trojans have been developed to compromise them. By far the worst offender/victim is Norton Antivirus, which aside from being of dubious quality, is frequently hijacked in my experience.
posted by : Dex, 04 October 2007

The best is?

I'd like the Author to provide a source upon which he claims Avast to be the best choice (I mean some sort of independent protection efficacy comparison). I myself use the free Avira AV because I found somewhere on the net such a comparison in which both Avast and AVG turned out to be way less effective than Avira's. Regards PS. Thanks for very good series of guide-articles.
posted by : Zu, 04 October 2007

Kudos for AVG

I've been using AVG for about 8 years now and it has never let me down. I upgraded from the free version to professional after a few years because I considered it an excellent product - worth paying for, even if I didn't have to. I have since upgraded to the Anti-Malware suite which includes spyware scanning.
posted by : Jim, 04 October 2007

Am I the only one who doesn't use one?

I havent used any antivirus software on my home (windows) pc's for years. They slow your computer down, hog all your memory and are generally very annoying.
I think any reasonably sensible person who follows basic rules (like not running exe's that you don't know), has a decent firewall and a secure browser doesn't need one.

Everyone once in a while I run use an online one but that's about it.

Obviously if other people are using your computer then you have don't have much choice.
posted by : Kevin, 04 October 2007

AV comparisons

You might be referring to http://winnow.oitc.com/malewarestats.php - which indeed (at least the last time I checked) places AntiVir at the top of the free options (and IIRC at least often at the top, period) in terms of virus detection rates (it detects a large percentage of scumware as well; the free version doesn't have an email scanner, but the real-time watchdog will still catch email nasties if you actually try to access them). AVG is however a good choice for Win98 users, since AntiVir doesn't provide real-time scanning on that platform (unfortunately, neither does AVG's free anti-spyware product, and while SpyTerminator does its real-time protection doesn't). Both use relatively small amounts of system resources (really: since we're not gamers we have no need for performance beyond that which 1 - 2 GHz Athlons can provide with 256 - 512 MB of RAM, and still don't notice any degradation while running these programs).

Comodo is indeed a good firewall choice for Win2K and later; we use Zone Alarm v5.5 for Win98 (their recent versions don't support it): since we sit behind a hardware firewall/router, nothing much makes it to the PC firewalls anyway. Jetico reportedly produces a better firewall for Win98, but our systems had serious problems with it.

While this series of articles is a good start, there's a great deal more relevant information available at www.techsupportalert.com (especially their list of over 100 useful freeware utilities for Windows).
posted by : Bill Todd, 04 October 2007

Whoops - forgot one comment

Trendmicro.com's 'housecall' on-line scanner is another good choice as confirmation that your base product has done its job - and it's more than happy to work in Firefox as well as IE.
posted by : Bill Todd, 04 October 2007

NOD32 ain't free

That's the reason why it wasn't included
posted by : Baka_toroi, 04 October 2007

out of date AV == no protection?

The author writes "The snag is that an out-of-date anti-virus program, even with the latest definitions, can't catch the new viruses that later versions have been rewritten to spot and remove."

That doesn't ring true to me, I was under the impression that the updates you download daily/weekly are the library of AV signatures that your files are checked against. I didn't think that any definitions are stored in the AV program exe itself.

I'd be interested in reading the links you have from your research
posted by : DaveP, 04 October 2007

best AV

I read in a popular pc mag out of the free programs Avira was the best & detected the most viruses in their tests.I originally used grisofts but it was awful & failed to detect a no of viruses,i switched to Avast but had this feeling it wasn't detecting all the viruses due to the behaviour of my computer.When the license ran out i switched to Avira & straight away it detected viruses that Avast had missed.I haven't had any virus related problems & I dont think their license license expires,i've been using it for over a yr now & have been impressed by it
posted by : David, 04 October 2007

Informative article, nice

To begin, I’m agreeing 100% with Dex’s commment,
especially the last paragraph.

One thing inq forgot to mention re ‘Free av's’ is an email Pop scanner.
I can only compare Avira and AVG as I use them both a lot.
Free AVG has an email scanner, it scans your pop{Outlook/OutlookExpress/Thumderbird etc} emails before you download them.

Free Avira does not have an email scanner,
however imo, avira is better, and I prefer it.
Lower ram/CPU usage, less intrusive for installing on home users PC's,
lack of an email scanner really sucks though, u really have to ask users are they “using Outlook/exp/thunder”, if yes then= AVG

On the other side of the argument...
I'm using a prog called spamihalator(white list based spam filter-must set to agressive/-=everything is spam/,/ add CSV friends=great), and it negates 99% of email virus'i'ss'es
However...
€Avira does remove spyware(paid for €avira also has email scanner~€20per year)

I(my small company) repair approx 20PC's a week, & I (ie. v small workforce) live with this sh1te day in, day out

The Brand leaders suck, as Dex pointed out, they have their own unique vulnerabilities, too many to mention
€avira hits spyware as well, so does Zone Alarm Pro btw

/
btw, wtf with the lack of firefox support? no Verification code presented?
had to copypasta into IE
pain in the ass
posted by : p0ln, 05 October 2007

AntiVir

Try out AntiVir. It's got an excellent detection rate... the best of any free scanner (besides BitDefender, I think...). Check out virus.gr for real scanning tests. What good is an AV that stinks at finding viruses? Also check out http://www.av-comparatives.org/. You'll be surprised.
posted by : Patrick_, 05 October 2007

Read my blog

Read my blog:

http://symantec-sucks.blogspot.com/

I had to create this blog because I needed a place where I could show the world what I see on my screen: the idiotic errors and blatant flaws in Symantec's Norton-branded products.

Have a look and see what I see. The screen captures are pretty self-explanatory.

posted by : Jeffy, 07 October 2007

Avast is very good

I personally use Avast at home and I have to say, the best av program out there. I've used this for 3 years already and it has saved my lots of times. Even if you go to a webpage with a virus on it, it will warn you then allow you to abort connection to that webpage. Register once a year for free, no biggy. Highly recommend.
posted by : Pete, 07 October 2007

Outdated == no protection

The author is right on that one..

Norton 2004 with the latest definitions from 07 will not be able to catch viruses that norton 2007 can with the same definitions... that is because the actual scanning engine has improved since...

Personally I will recommend you just pay for NOD32... one of the best things I can say about it... there is NO working crack for it (there is a regfix that works for a day and then stops as it autoupdates). And I just can't trust an antivirus like norton or trendmicro that you can have cracked and patching itself without distrupting the crack (the same method crackers used to bypass the DRM can be used by viruses to take over the antivirus... which I often see happening with norton in my line of work as an at home/office computer repairman)
posted by : taltamir, 07 October 2007

antivirus software

I now realise I am a complete novice about antivirus/firewalls. Having used Norton for years is it right that I can get better protection both virus and firewall for free or cheaper and more efficient?

Is there a problem with installing new antivirus software while Norton is still on my computer?
posted by : Sid, 06 December 2007
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup