Sat 05 Jul 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Never use an Intel deposition to end a sentence with

AMD antitrust saga grinds on
LAWYERS FOR AMD said they would take Intel's deposition on preservation of documents.

This preposition for a deposition means that an Intel person must provide testimony under oath although it doesn't have to be made in court, but in chambers, as we Brits have it.

AMD explained that this step is part of the discovery process and will let it and the class plaintiffs respond to Chipzilla's disclosures.

Intel gets to choose who the appropriate witnesses are - so we suspect we won't be seeing Sean Maloney and Paul Otellini a-testifying in front of Justice Hoseph Farnan. µ

IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup