delete the article

I think the article should be deleted, why was it published in the first place? Why risk bringing this to the attention of unsavoury individuals?
The last comment is just so unprofessional.
Regards
K

Karl, you're banned. Ed.

Jim Hacker

That's why that torpedo landed on Sandwich golf course!

Americans should never know more than they need to know. Then they can't tell anyone.

Like secret agents, they could be captured and tortured by the BBC to Noah Vale.

Don't change habits now and she's nun the wiser! Get it? Sin-not-t?

Be sure to send our Mr. Sinnott's new email address to W, signed simply Mildenhall -- yes that's a nice touch!

In the message text make this simple for George, as follows:

The fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform perhaps felt the information needed as to whether to inform the highest authority of the known information was not yet known, and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed, because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed. BRB

CC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Something strange afoot

For him to lose control of the domain at this stage, sounds rather strange, I am sure that someone who had a domain getting such mail, is not going to let their domain subs lapse, in case it got into the wrong hands. So something does not sound right there.

It is no problem receiving unwanted mail, you just direct to a sub folder, hardly stressful, so I wonder what the deal is?