Sun 06 Jul 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

RIAA's 'making available' theory falls

Comments

Who's responsibility?

Who holds the responsibility for securing your copyrighted works from theft?

Me?

I have to pay for it.

Then, once I own it, I must protect it for YOUR sake from theft?

Or face prosecution?

In what tin-pot dictat....nevermind!
posted by : Nick, 26 February 2008

Case law?

Not that I think anyone would care at this point, but the United States is a "Constitutional Republic," which means it's supposed(key word here) to be a nation of written law. Case law is not law, it just isn't. When judges and lawyers turn to case law, they are basically leaving the legal system behind and ruling based on a weird sort of conceptual momentum.

Let's be clear, case law is not law. The verdict of a case applies to that case, and that case only. If lawmakers(judges are not lawmakers) want to base laws on the decisions of cases, they can try, but the case involved is still just a case.
posted by : Jason Goatcher, 29 February 2008

Add a new comment:

Name:
Email:
Comment Title:
Comment:
Verification code:
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis