Edited by Paul Hales
Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.
Terms and Conditions of use.
To advertise in Europe e-mail here
To advertise in Asia email here.
To advertise in North America email here.
Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:
Comments
Yeah right!
45nm is to make it cheaper compared to 65nm. (45nm means more profit)So they prefer that the cost to make their products should be higher because AMD can't compete?
They just want to take some time to sort out some problems.
45nm isn't mature for mass production THAT is what they are saying!
Fuits
Fruits of monopoly has been served in advance.Thats all to Intel fanboys.
Fruity Indeed
Being someone who relies on fast but reasonably priced CPU's to get a bit of work done it's somewhat disapointing that Intel decides it can slow down because the competition has it's knickers in a twist.As pointed out. Fruits of the current "tecnology Monopoly".
It's twice as dissapointing though that AMD are so cocked up at the mo. They've been in big do do for over a year. What gives? The time for shortcuts (two chips glued together) has been and gone but in a few months time if nothings resolved then this statement could be repeated. Maybe sticking 2 athlons together is a waste of time. Maybe it's not. One things for sure, when everything is sorted out AMD should glue two Phenoms together to give Intel a kick in the balls!
We can all get back to more and faster in short order
Add a new comment: